Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy) header
Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy) profile picture

Venturing into something new. Let's see where that takes us.

Joined September 2023
Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)Photo by Trinity Morphy (@TrinityMorphy)
Replying to @oyinkanbadejo
Economics, itself as a field, is fundamentally based on the concept of scarcity.
99
Khan Academy (free) - khanacademy.org/ MathAcademy (paid, but is more rigorous and customised) -mathacademy.com/
2
10
793
Replying to @enyinna_
Considered legal processes early on. But after some thinking, I decided to let it be. With God and time on my side, I'll definitely run it back up.
24
Replying to @enyinna_
February. Helped a deathly sick friend settle their hospital bills so they could be attended to with an arrangement to be paid back. Said person refused to. That act set me back so badly it might take a year or two to overcome the effects. Sometimes, I almost regret it.
1
2
155
Replying to @ebubethecyborg
Congratulations Dr. PeeJay
1
1
40
Replying to @OshatimiDavid
Unrelated but learnt about CDS yesterday after watching Big Short for the first time. 😄
8
Definitely, my statement is just comic relief 😄
1
14
Replying to @the_akinola
Or call Spl income statement.
2
159
11 months since my last post. A lot has changed. Glad to be back.
1
5
134
Replying to @oyinkanbadejo
At this recurring weekend hangout called The Circle, everybody knows my default answer to any societal problem is a varied form "oh yeah, wrong incentives". Might be a dogmatic stand, but I strongly believe incentives drive everything; the good, bad, and ugly.
64
Trinity Morphy retweeted
Effective Public Goods Funding (PGF) suffers from high evaluation costs. On average, assessing a round costs 10% of the total funding pool; the actual figure scales upward with the size of the round’s pool. This overhead directly diverts capital away from the participants who need it most. Our research, proposed for @Artizen Fund Season 6, aims to reclaim these resources by answering three critical questions: Cost Efficiency: To what extent can LLM evaluators reduce the overhead of human-led processes? Collective Intelligence: Can we implement the Wisdom of the Crowd theory into this LLM evaluation framework to achieve superior crowd evaluation intelligence? Accuracy: How do LLM evaluations perform relative to human benchmarks in subjective contexts? Our goal is simple: minimize the cost of distribution to maximize the impact of the capital. And we would really appreciate your support for the Artizen Fund by purchasing our research artifact here: artizen.fund/index/p/utilisi… Thank you 🙏
2
5
190
I agree 100%. Math Academy is scarily effective.
1
28
I love the fact that you can't take a course without prerequisite knowledge. For every course you want to embark on, they test your prerequisite knowledge and offer lessons to strengthen your foundation. This way, you don't experience learning gaps while taking the course.
34
In line with option 2, I recently submitted a research prop to @Artizen season six to see how LLMs might play the evaluator role in PGF rounds. It's a black box worth exploring. artizen.fund/index/p/utilisi…
13
Replying to @governingweb3
My take is that; 1. Human evaluators have flaws. 2. We need to sufficiently explore AI evaluators and their flaws. 3. The Human+AI option where we combine the strengths of both evaluator types and minimise their flaws will yield more optimal evaluation scenarios.
1
13