Community Mod Champ @fermah_xyz | Researcher @plebVCC | @tapioca_dao pearl club | Prev @unizik941fm On Air Personality |

Joined September 2020
My Friend Tej once pertook in a validator node contest, but only the top 200 active nodes would secure the Blockchain network. purchasing a vps, he spun up a node and was among the first 50 nodes to go live What could possibly go wrong?? The $100,000 mistake a 🧵 $VPS
10
12
4
26
2,639
V-for Vendetta exposed Covid: The company Moderna actually created the Covid 19 vaccine(genetic sequence) within 48 hours MODERNA got $2.1 Billion from NIH and BARDA NIH funded Fauci and Ecohealth who were running “Gain of Function Research on Covid virus to make them DEADLIER”
Yet there are hundreds of thousands of indoctrinated "qualified doctors" who are still swearing by them. They should ALL face prosecution for Crimes Against Humanity and pay the ultimateprice for genocide.
2
8
22
684
0xKaarson retweeted
This is the CIA openly calling for Cuban citizens to become agents and commit treason. Yet when you suggest to Nigerians that this same CIA has an enormous interest in Nigeria, the most populous African country and a potential global superpower, they foam at the mouth.
“A aquellos que buscan crear un cambio positivo en Cuba – Este es el momento. La decepción de las promesas fallidas, la corrupción, y las vidas privilegiadas de unos pocos – Aprovecha esta oportunidad de crear el cambio que deseas a través de una asociación discreta con la CIA.”
32
642
19
1,424
26,311
The mechanism is actually one of the cleaner designs I’ve seen. They take yield-bearing collateral (wstETH / WBTC), split it into a stable side (fxUSD) and a leveraged side (x/sPOSITION). The math forces the total value of both sides to always equal the collateral.
5月开始写 @protocol_fx 持续至今。 目前累计80枚 $FXN 奖励(6月30枚、7月15枚、8月15枚、9月20枚),目前价值1,898美元,解锁都在2027年,最终可兑现金额还不确定。 此前 @TermMaxFi 锁仓后币价下跌,账面与实际兑现存在很大落差,当时朋友劝说直接拿30%还能变现2000美金,后来肠子都悔青了,在币圈行业项目更迭更快。 对 #FXProtocol 持续观察后,对协议结构有了更清晰认识了,fxUSD与ETH、BTC杠杆仓位直接关联;Stability Pool维护价格并接收部分费用与抵押收益;fxSAVE自动复投,并可在Morpho作为抵押借入USDC。 奖励是参与因素之一,但仍需验证2027年解锁是否按规则执行、fxSAVE在Morpho是否具备真实借贷需求,以及社区贡献能否持续获得回应。 先记录现状,待解锁时再核对吧。
1
2
4
200
the underlying staking yield, and fxSAVE just tokenizes that pool into an auto-compounding vault. That’s why it can be used as Morpho collateral and actually generate real borrow demand. It’s not magic and it’s not risk-free,
1
8
but the core invariant + fee flow is more coherent than most “real yield” stable attempts this cycle. Whether the leverage demand stays high enough long-term is still the open question.✊🏿
4
Borrow rate just printed 2.34%.fxSAVE still printing ~6.35% auto-compounded.That spread + 10x loop = 42% APR on pure USDC. A few weeks ago the same market was showing 4%+ borrow rates and ~15-28% looped yields. Now the cost of capital has collapsed and the math is even cleaner
42% APR on USDC. No, that’s not a typo. → Deposit USDC into fxSAVE (6.35%, autocompounding) → Borrow USDC against it on Morpho at 2.34% → 🔁 🔁 🔁 up to 10x All in one transaction. Links in the next tweet 👇
2
24
When the product line up, like the ones @aladdindao team got, from @protocol_fx to its affiliated @FX100Perp are the underlying products it really makes arriving at your thesis quite more easy. The potential upside are limitless and organic demand for the services are prone💯
One thing I've learned after years in crypto is that the market usually gives you another chance to buy projects you believe in. The tricky part is keeping your emotions in check when that opportunity comes around. It's easy to question everything when prices are falling and sentiment turns negative. That's when I try to ask myself something simple: have the fundamentals actually changed, or is it mainly the price? That's why @rektdiomedes's post resonated with me. I share his preference for focusing on fundamentals rather than price action, although I also believe there are times when price deserves our attention. I've always preferred spending my time researching projects, understanding what they're building, following their progress and sharing what I learn with the community. That's where I feel I can contribute the most. Of course, price is part of the picture too. It fluctuates, but I tend to believe that when a project has strong fundamentals, keeps improving and builds products people actually use, the market will eventually have reasons to recognize that value. How long that takes is another question. It's also why I've made a habit of keeping interesting projects on my watchlist. When the market goes through one of its sales, I revisit that list, check whether the reasons I was interested in those projects still hold up, and evaluate whether the current prices offer a good opportunity to open or increase a position. ethereum:0x365accfca291e7d3914637abf1f7635db165bb09 is a good example of how I approach this. I started buying at much higher prices than today. Even back then, I believed @protocol_fx was undervalued and had considerable room to grow. Since then, the protocol has continued evolving. More products, more functionality, more collaborations and integrations across DeFi. From fxUSD and leveraged positions to fxSAVE, fxMINT, new opportunities around onchain yield, and growing efforts in privacy. There's considerably more to the ecosystem today than when I first started following it. And much of that progress has happened while the market has offered opportunities to buy ethereum:0x365accfca291e7d3914637abf1f7635db165bb09 at lower prices. I've tried to take advantage of those opportunities whenever I could. Does that mean I know where ethereum:0x365accfca291e7d3914637abf1f7635db165bb09 is going next? Of course not. I'm simply sharing how I see things based on my own experience, and I hope it's useful to someone else. NFA, DYOR. But when I look at everything that's been built since my first purchases, it's difficult not to appreciate how far the protocol has come. And that evolution is also why I've been paying such close attention to @FX100Perp. After watching how f(x) has approached leverage over the years, I was curious to see what that same experience could bring to perpetual trading. FX100 takes that work in a new direction, with its own approach to protecting leveraged positions during short-term volatility. I've been following its testnet closely, and the numbers have been pretty interesting. Around $9.1B in cumulative trading volume over ten weeks, with more than half of that coming in the last four weeks alone. More than 2 million positions opened, 44,488 unique wallets, and a record $1.68B traded in week 10. That's a lot of activity for a testnet, and it's encouraging to see the momentum continuing as FX100 approaches mainnet. The team recently mentioned November as the expected launch window, which makes the coming weeks particularly interesting. But beyond following the numbers, I've also been experimenting with FX100 myself. My first trades included a few $BTC shorts and some altcoin positions in both directions. And the biggest learning curve for me wasn't choosing a direction. It was figuring out how to plan the entry properly. I wanted to combine three things as effectively as possible: choosing leverage that made sense for each setup, placing limit orders around the levels I'd identified on the chart, and timing those entries to make the most of FX100's 15-minute liquidation protection window. Each part seemed straightforward on its own. But getting all three to fit together into a trade I was comfortable with took more thought and practice than I initially expected. That's probably what stood out to me the most during those first trades. The protection window gives you an interesting tool to work with, but how you plan and manage the trade around it still matters. And something else became pretty clear along the way: it's easy to underestimate the importance of TP/SL when you're trading with testnet funds. You can get so focused on finding the right entry that you don't give your exit strategy nearly as much attention. But once there's real capital involved on mainnet, that's something I definitely wouldn't want to overlook. The 15-minute protection window can help with short-lived adverse price movements, but it doesn't replace proper risk management. And in a way, that brings me back to the original point. Whether I'm considering adding to a long-term position in ethereum:0x365accfca291e7d3914637abf1f7635db165bb09 or opening a leveraged trade on FX100, experience has taught me to spend more time understanding what I'm doing and less time reacting emotionally to the latest price movement. You won't always get the perfect entry. You won't always get the timing right. But doing your homework means that when the market gives you another opportunity, you're in a much better position to recognize it.
5
56
Saw someone say this is democratizing a strategy only sophisticated DeFi Natives could implement Used to be: deposit fxSAVE, borrow USDC on Morpho, buy more, repeat, watch the spread, pray the PT doesn’t gap, update the cells.
Magic is real: ~28% APR on USDC. How? fxSAVE × @nine_summits: 1️⃣ Deposit USDC 2️⃣ fxLOOP loops it up to 7x into fxSAVE and/or PT-fxSAVE 3️⃣ Poof ✨ 28% APR done The real trick is starting with one of the most conservative yield-bearing stablecoins in DeFi.
1
4
48
Now it’s a vault. Same trade. Someone else’s risk engine. You just fund USDC and hold the receipt. 28% APR is still leverage on a spread. The base yield is still the boring part. The product is that the boring part finally has a button.
1
1
13
If the spread dies, the number dies. At least you won’t be the one who forgot to delever at 4am. @protocol_fx $fxUSD $FXN
1
14
haven't jumped on any testnet for 2 years now if i am doing this you know i really believe it's a primitive with exponential value prop to Perps - 100x leverage - 15 minutes liquidation protection Register for @FX100Perp testnet with my code: hiring.fx100.club/r/RUhFd1Ul…
1
28
Just 10 days it was $20M borrowed against fxSAVE → now $27M+ USDC already supplied into the same Morpho market at 13.45% APY. That’s real, organic demand for a yield-bearing stable collateral that you can’t beat
Lending USDC on Morpho? Here’s an offer you can’t refuse: 13.45% APY on your stables. $27M+ already supplied. Can your market match it? If not, the fxSAVE/USDC market link is in the next tweet 👇
1
3
58
While most USDC markets struggle to clear 5-7%, this one keeps attracting capital because the underlying is auto-compounding real protocol revenue (leverage fees + staking yield). Tl/dr Bullish signals for you: • Rapid scaling from $20M → $25M+ borrowed in under a week
1
14
• High utilization still holding • Curated by RockawayX + Clearstar • Clean looping opportunity still exists on the other side If you’re sitting on idle USDC and want actual yield instead of cope APYs, this is currently one of the strongest offers on Morpho.
5
Wait the fuck!!! The total valuation of TikTok US is not above $40 Billion And you lots were clapping?? 🤡
‘I made $72 BILLION ON TIKTOK — Trump number ONE — TAYLOR SWIFT is 19’ ‘CAN YOU BELIEVE IT’ ‘THEY SAY, TIKTOK IS ABOUT CHINA’
1
2
21
Alright now here is something worth my time!!! It’s genuinely been a long time a genuinely primitive product lunched in this space, that offers something even the biggest CEXs and Perp Dexes can’t offer I will be locking in on the @FX100Perp testnet all the way✊🏿
2
29
Hello @0xDawny Dawny, let's look at actual track record of @protocol_fx $fxUSD instead of theory $USDC (the biggest “1:1 USD claim”) depegged to $0.87 in March 2023 when Circle had $3.3B stuck at Silicon Valley Bank. That was pure traditional-system / banking-counterparty risk
Replying to @protocol_fx
yeah a stablecoin backed by ETH/BTC isn't "more stable" it's just a claim on a different balance sheet with more vol. also lol at using that GS quote when stablecoins are literally 1:1 USD claims anyway
1
1
2
52
exactly the balance-sheet exposure the original post was pointing at $USDT also wobbled hard to ~$0.945 in May 2022 during the UST contagion. Meanwhile $fxUSD has been live since Feb 2024. In that time it has sat through multiple sharp crypto drawdowns and volatility spikes.
1
13