Yuukimaru

The single most important mantra DR people need right now is: Stop hoping that by escaping to some place you will attain the kind of life boomers had. Was a historical anomaly. You will find it nowhere. Start hoping to become tough enough to prosper while living in the trenches.

Knowing Democrats will push censorship, try to put you in jail, and flood your country with immigrants; But still voting for Democrats to punish Republicans is stupid because it assumes that the goal of the Republican politicians is to win. But as long as you demonstrate the willingness to vote for Democrats if you sufficiently dislike Republican politicians, the donors who want Democrats to win will just fund whatever Republican politician is good at making you vote for Democrats. And there are plenty of Republican politicians who are perfectly happy just getting a lot of money to lose elections. The correct strategy: If your group has no power to influence elections, stop pretending it does. If your group does have power to influence elections, start a 3rd party, run on "Trump is too ineffective on immigration", and take a small portion of the Republican Party candidate's votes. For example if the Democrat candidate gets 48%, the Republican candidate 47%, and your candidate 1.5%, then congratulations you have successfully punished Republicans. But without incentivizing the Democrat donors to fund more such Republicans into success.

In case you didn't already know that Nick Fuentes is a controlled opposition and not on our side: Look how hard the establishment Republicans are shilling for him, right after he told his followers to vote for Democrats.

"Turning the other cheek" is fine only when you are dealing with your personal enemies who are members of your in-group. In-group being the people who are loyal to the same kings (political leaders, judges) and obeys the same gods (principles, rules, moral codes). When you get slapped by a political enemy, a member of an out-group, someone who is loyal to different kings and obeys different gods, it evil for you to turn the other cheek. When you react by turning the other cheek to getting slapped by a political enemy, the result is that he will slap you again but harder. Then if you turn the other cheek again, he will stab you in the neck, steal your property, rape your daughter, and castrate your son. Despite what the preachers of hyper-liberalized Christianity might tell you, being a cowardly pushover is not a virtue.

If a rightoid influencer told his audience that everything is fine, he would quickly lose followers. Rightoid influencers know that in order to keep their audience interested, they do need talk about how bad things really are. So rightoid influencers do talk about how bad things really are. At some point, a rightoid influencer's audience notices the uncomfortable absence of solutions proposed by him. Eventually his audience starts pressuring the rightoid influencer to start talking about solutions. But the rightoid influencer is kinda dumb and his audience is even dumber. He can't come up with an intelligent solution, and even if he could, most of his audience wouldn't understand it. So instead he opts to propose a dumb solution. But it can't be just any dumb solution. The more complex his dumb solution is, the more suspicious the audience would get about it. If it's something that doesn't intuitively make sense to his audience, then the audience would start asking questions. The rightoid influencer doesn't want to be asked questions about his proposed solution, because then he would get exposed for proposing something dumb. Instead, he opts to propose as a solution something that intuitively makes sense to his audience, something that doesn't need explaining, because they would do it anyway. But even if his proposed solution falls under general activity that his audience would partake in anyway, if he got too specific with his instructions about how it should be done, then if his audience was doing that activity in a different way before, the audience would still start asking questions, particularly "Why do I have to do it that way?" So the solutions the rightoid influencer proposes definitely must be both something his audience would do anyway, and just pointing to a general offline activity without giving complex instructions about how to partake in that activity. After the rightoid influencer takes all this into account, he picks one of the following to propose as a solution to genuine and serious political problems: - Go outside / Touch grass - Grow your own food - Go to church - Start a family / Make children - Join a local club or an organization The rightoid influencer doesn't get more specific than this, but he does try to mystify the activity from the above list that he proposed as a solution to serious and genuine political problems. He can't present it as something mundane and ordinary, that people have been doing in continuity for thousands of years. He has to present it as a shiny magical new thing that he rediscovered from ancient ruins, and something that will surely defeat the liberal establishment as soon as more people start doing it.

Rightoids on X kept saying "Abolish the 19th". And I kept asking "Why the 19th and not 13th?" Zionists kept saying "White women are the problem, they are too liberal". Reality? Reality is that White women's voting pattern is much closer to that of White men, compared to any other demographic group.

There is currently a loneliness epidemic. Many young people have less than 3 friends. Many writers blame dating apps, social media, and even delivery services. But that's not an accurate diagnosis. Social structures, including friend groups, for their long-term survival always needed support of the economic incentives. Social structures that used to exist, such as tribes, clans, big families, communities, and even big friend groups all collapsed because the economic incentives for membership in them have disappeared. How did economic incentives for membership in social structures disappear? - The services they used to provide to their members became available through the market economy. And due to the technological progress, the market economy became much more efficient at providing them. This is important to understand because it provides us with clarity on how to build long-lasting social structures such as communities and friend groups. The key is to find a service which the market economy is not providing to some people for whatever reason. And then start a social structure around the goal of that providing that service to them.

If you are a reproductive White person, both parties hate you. Making 4D chess arguments about which party winning is the lesser of two evils is a waste of time. Instead, we need to build parallel institutions. Without that, there isn't going to be any based takeover of GOP, and we will have nothing to protect us when Democrats eventually take back the White House.

Utopianism doesn't work because human orders are subject to darwinian selection pressures, just as much as spiders or zebras are. (By 'human orders' I mean organizational systems influencing human behavior, such as governments, corporations, churches, families, clubs, etc) Human orders too, to survive and thrive, must compete with systems similar to themselves for the available resources within the same domain (area of space). Just like lions and spotted hyenas in African savanna compete for the zebras, human orders compete for time, effort, and loyalty of its members. Lets say a group of leftists decides that their government should work according to the principle "To each according to his need, from each according to his ability. To achieve this goal, they form a human order, specifically a political movement. They try to apply their own principle to their own human order. Soon they see that they are getting outcompeted by other political movements that aren't following that principle. Because they have a lot of very needy incompetent members, draining productive hours and material resources from the less needy more compent members. Eventually they realize that their political movement has its own needs, which they were neglecting. So they decide that in order to grow their political movement to the point where it will be able to seize control of the government, they must temporarily suspend giving to each of their members and would be members according to their need. They assure each other that this pause is for the greater good, that they will resume giving to each according to his need once they control the government and are hence able to take care of the greater quantity of people. Because they decided to prioritize the needs of their political movement, they eventually succeed at seizing control of the government. Then they briefly attempt to give to each according to their need. Then they notice that the government is now their human order, and that it too has its needs. Their government doesn't have enough money to repair its roads, doesn't have enough tanks to protect its borders, etc. And then they see one of their government's provinces trying to defect to another government. Just like their political movement needed to compete with other political movements, now their government needs to compete with other governments. So eventually they decide that it's better to prioritize the needs of their government over the needs of their most needy citizens. At least temporarily, until their government is strong enough to take care of more people's needs. Because they strongly prioritized the needs of their government, eventually it becomes the world's strongest government. But somewhere along the way, between foudning their political movement and becoming the strongest government in the world, they happened to accumulate a lot of greedy opportunists that never genuinely cared about the needy. They want to start taking care of the needy, but the corrupt faction within their government is growing. So in order to be better able to eventually take care of the needy citizens, they decide that their faction within the government is a human order that has its own needs, and they agree to postpone taking care of the needy citizens, until they defeat the corrupt faction within their government. But this time they lose. Because they are old, have been in power for decades, and have yet to deliver on their promises to the needy citizens. Needy citizens who are now supporting some new political movement. A new political movement that the corrupt faction within their government was willing to ally with, to protect its privileges against the faction of the old ideologues.