#IranMassacre2026 Jan, 55 K were Slaughtered

It is difficult to justify the cost of living in a city whose leadership appears increasingly selective in its commitment to democratic freedoms. Frankfurt cannot present itself as an international city of tolerance and openness while failing to ensure that freedom of political expression and public safety are protected equally. The apparent double standards in the city's treatment of Iranian political voices, particularly in the contrast between its public gestures of solidarity with certain activists and the controversy surrounding Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi's appearance, raise serious questions about political consistency and institutional accountability. Residents work hard and pay substantial taxes. They deserve clean streets, reliable public transport, effective public services and, above all, a city that takes public safety seriously. If Frankfurt's mayor cannot uphold these basic responsibilities and guarantee equal protection for freedom of expression, he/She should resign. @egnargess

No wonder the regime has survived for almost five decades. The threats and intimidation directed at Iranian patriots and freedom fighters by the 1979 Islamist–Marxist-Leninist regime, as well as by far-left and ultra-left activists, are neither new nor confined to any one country. What is particularly disturbing is the persistent willingness of Western institutions and sections of Western society to capitulate to these threats. The cancellation of Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi’s speech is a case in point. Meanwhile, the MEK and certain so-called activists have effectively become proxies for the terrorists regime’s machinery of intimidation, helping extend its reach and silence Iranian voices across the diaspora. Under the guise of journalism, activism and freedom of expression, they exploit the very liberties they claim to defend to legitimise hatred, intimidate dissenters and impose ideological censorship. In fact, some have built careers, platforms and political relevance around Iranian suffering, yet show little interest in the freedom Iranians themselves are demanding. They appear more invested in preserving their own influence than in recognising the political aspirations of the Iranian people.