
History, Philosophy, Politics (Unionist). Rugby in all its forms, occasionally football, mountains/hills, whisky, ale! Member of @SpeechUnion
Glasgow
Joined March 2012
- Tweets103K
- Following4.1K
- Followers1.3K
- Likes612K
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
Lots of wisdom in these passages.
"The constant reading of the bible in hundreds of thousands of humble families kept a basic floor of literacy under literature as a whole, and under the English language. The variety of styles of writing so admirably represented, the relative complexity of many of the ideas involved and the range of ethical levels to be found in that great compendium of ancient Hebrew culture demanded, in its reading and in its exposition to the children, a certain mental activity, and provided for the poorer classes the same sort of cultural groundwork that the study of Greek and Latin provided for the sons of the rich. A mind accustomed to the Old and New Testaments could easily admit Shakespeare and the entire range of Victorian writing: poetry, novels, historic and scientific essays, up to the saturation point of that particular intelligence. Today the English-speaking peoples have no such common basic classical education. The bottom level is the visual and aural culture of the movies, not a literary level at all. Above that appear all sorts of gradations of illiteracy, from those who, though they may have learned to read in school, are now barely able to spell out the captions in the pictures, to those who can take in, with the help of the photographs, a few simple sentences out of the daily tabloids, right through to the several millions of actively literate people who can read right through The Saturday Evening Post or The Reader’s Digest and understand every word of it. This is the literal truth. Every statistical survey that has recently been made of literacy in this country has produced the most staggering results. We have to face the fact that the number of Americans capable of reading a page of anything not aimed at the mentality of a child of twelve is not only on the decrease but probably rapidly on the decrease."
John Dos Passos
An over simplification but some truth here. Albert Jay Nock had the same idea - being able to read is not the same as being literate. Brings to mind Lincoln whose formal schooling lasted about six months, perhaps a year. He succinctly summed up his educational background in 1858, when he filled out a brief biographical sketch for the upcoming Dictionary of Congress: “Education defective,” it read. Primarily self-taught he read the Bible & Shakespeare avidly.
In an 1860 biography of candidate Lincoln, journalist William Dean Howells wrote that Mr. Lincoln was “a diligent student of Shakespeare, to know whom is a liberal education.” There's no denying this. Historian William E. Gienapp: "Lincoln’s gift for language was marvelous, even poetic, so much so that he is the only American president other than Thomas Jefferson whose writings can be considered literature.”
As for the King James Bible:
"The King James Bible came at the end of the Elizabethan age, between Shakespeare and Milton, when Englishmen were using words more passionately, richly, vigorously, wittily, and sublimely than ever before or since."
Dwight Macdonald
"The constant reading of the bible in hundreds of thousands of humble families kept a basic floor of literacy under literature as a whole, and under the English language. The variety of styles of writing so admirably represented, the relative complexity of many of the ideas involved and the range of ethical levels to be found in that great compendium of ancient Hebrew culture demanded, in its reading and in its exposition to the children, a certain mental activity, and provided for the poorer classes the same sort of cultural groundwork that the study of Greek and Latin provided for the sons of the rich. A mind accustomed to the Old and New Testaments could easily admit Shakespeare and the entire range of Victorian writing: poetry, novels, historic and scientific essays, up to the saturation point of that particular intelligence. Today the English-speaking peoples have no such common basic classical education. The bottom level is the visual and aural culture of the movies, not a literary level at all. Above that appear all sorts of gradations of illiteracy, from those who, though they may have learned to read in school, are now barely able to spell out the captions in the pictures, to those who can take in, with the help of the photographs, a few simple sentences out of the daily tabloids, right through to the several millions of actively literate people who can read right through The Saturday Evening Post or The Reader’s Digest and understand every word of it. This is the literal truth. Every statistical survey that has recently been made of literacy in this country has produced the most staggering results. We have to face the fact that the number of Americans capable of reading a page of anything not aimed at the mentality of a child of twelve is not only on the decrease but probably rapidly on the decrease."
John Dos Passos
An over simplification but some truth here. Albert Jay Nock had the same idea - being able to read is not the same as being literate. Brings to mind Lincoln whose formal schooling lasted about six months, perhaps a year. He succinctly summed up his educational background in 1858, when he filled out a brief biographical sketch for the upcoming Dictionary of Congress: “Education defective,” it read. Primarily self-taught he read the Bible & Shakespeare avidly.
In an 1860 biography of candidate Lincoln, journalist William Dean Howells wrote that Mr. Lincoln was “a diligent student of Shakespeare, to know whom is a liberal education.” There's no denying this. Historian William E. Gienapp: "Lincoln’s gift for language was marvelous, even poetic, so much so that he is the only American president other than Thomas Jefferson whose writings can be considered literature.”
As for the King James Bible:
"The King James Bible came at the end of the Elizabethan age, between Shakespeare and Milton, when Englishmen were using words more passionately, richly, vigorously, wittily, and sublimely than ever before or since."
Dwight Macdonald
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
There is no point to the Commonwealth. Abolish it.
These “modest” proposals include:
“monetary compensation as reparations from enslaving
nations, monarchies, churches, institutions, corporations and families, for loss of life and uncompensated labour, loss of liberty, personal injury, mental pain and anguish and gender-based violence” and
The “complete cancellation of
all CARICOM-European bilateral debt as a complementary mechanism to the
demand for monetary compensation”
Delusional
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
It’s a sign of how far gays have come that @christianorguk now resolutely defends the rights of gay teens. And a sign of how far the LGBT+ lobby has fallen that @PeterTatchell tells outright lies to get a law passed that harms gay teens. Tatchell is clearly incapable of shame.
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
“Simon Calvert, the deputy director of the charity The Christian Institute, said it was “quite clear” that the legislation could “criminalise parents praying for their children”.
He told The Telegraph: “It is a bizarre new approach to the criminal law which makes all kinds of legitimate speech vulnerable to police investigation.
“Lawyers are lining up to condemn the way it’s drafted. And the activists the Government are trying to placate are quite open that they really do want the law to ‘put the fear’ into parents over their family prayers.”
Mr Calvert added: “Elizabeth I famously declined to make windows into men’s souls. This bill makes a window and will force police, prosecutors and courts to peer through it to decide if your intentions, your beliefs, mean your conversation with your gay or trans friend was a criminal offence.”
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
I've seen some thoughtful replies to this. One idea I've also been worrying about is that, rather than remembering, we are starting to forget. I think particularly of young people, who may simply not know, through no fault of their own.
You may have seen my tweet lamenting that my kid brother's school hadn't mentioned the Gunpowder Plot on Thursday (or before). I wondered whether the same could be said of Remembrance (surely not).
Before I could raise it, he told me his school hadn't sold poppies this year, as it usually does (the school council used to organise it), and that nobody was wearing one. He's an astute kid.
With all this in mind, I asked whether Remembrance or the Poppy Appeal had been mentioned at school this year. I knew his year group assembly wouldn't have covered it, since that was on Diwali this week, but perhaps in tutorial. Alas, the answer was no. I'm now waiting for Armistice Day, when his school usually holds the national two minutes' silence, to see whether it gets a mention then.
Obviously this doesn’t explain the lack of poppies this year among adults, but children are the future, and if younger generations aren’t learning about this sort of thing (and I’m not sure I trust parents/families to pass down in every instance), the future is bleak - not just for the Poppy Appeal, but for many of our traditions and customs which are dependent on being passed from generation to generation.
I'm definitely not a member of the poppy police, but I will note a lack of poppies this year. When I was a kid, you'd never see poppies around my way (2000s Tottenham wasn't really natural territory for the Poppy Appeal…), but getting on the Tube was always different - you'd see many a poppy wearer on the Tube. It's still the same now as an adult: you don't see poppies around my way (again, I live in an area that's, shall we say, not really fertile ground for Remembrance generally), but you do on the Tube and in central London. Not this year, however.
Granted, there has been a decline post-pandemic, but it occurred to me today that I haven't seen a single other poppy on public transport this year. Indeed, I've seen only two other people wearing poppies (both elderly): one in a shop and another at a bus stop. Obviously, this is just the journeys I've taken. Tonight I've been in Bethnal Green, in a bustling pub and later queuing in a very busy chippy. Again, not a poppy in sight, which seems unusual. I wonder whether there is a reason for this trend.
Remembrance isn't about wearing something on your chest, and I'm sure plenty of people will be remembering, especially over the coming days, regardless of whether they have a poppy on their lapel. So this is definitely not a criticism of anyone (as I say, I'm not keen on poppy policing). But I do find it really odd that I haven't seen poppies anywhere. This has never happened before, certainly not to this extent. I do wonder why, especially as we approach Remembrance Sunday and Armistice Day. It just seems really weird to me.
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
I'm definitely not a member of the poppy police, but I will note a lack of poppies this year. When I was a kid, you'd never see poppies around my way (2000s Tottenham wasn't really natural territory for the Poppy Appeal…), but getting on the Tube was always different - you'd see many a poppy wearer on the Tube. It's still the same now as an adult: you don't see poppies around my way (again, I live in an area that's, shall we say, not really fertile ground for Remembrance generally), but you do on the Tube and in central London. Not this year, however.
Granted, there has been a decline post-pandemic, but it occurred to me today that I haven't seen a single other poppy on public transport this year. Indeed, I've seen only two other people wearing poppies (both elderly): one in a shop and another at a bus stop. Obviously, this is just the journeys I've taken. Tonight I've been in Bethnal Green, in a bustling pub and later queuing in a very busy chippy. Again, not a poppy in sight, which seems unusual. I wonder whether there is a reason for this trend.
Remembrance isn't about wearing something on your chest, and I'm sure plenty of people will be remembering, especially over the coming days, regardless of whether they have a poppy on their lapel. So this is definitely not a criticism of anyone (as I say, I'm not keen on poppy policing). But I do find it really odd that I haven't seen poppies anywhere. This has never happened before, certainly not to this extent. I do wonder why, especially as we approach Remembrance Sunday and Armistice Day. It just seems really weird to me.
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
A lot of this is the fault of the Royal British Legion itself. For the last four years it’s been a nightmare trying to get poppies to sell at church - and I presume others have had the same problem. This means there are fewer poppies to buy - and the paper ones are now useless and fall off within hours.
I'm definitely not a member of the poppy police, but I will note a lack of poppies this year. When I was a kid, you'd never see poppies around my way (2000s Tottenham wasn't really natural territory for the Poppy Appeal…), but getting on the Tube was always different - you'd see many a poppy wearer on the Tube. It's still the same now as an adult: you don't see poppies around my way (again, I live in an area that's, shall we say, not really fertile ground for Remembrance generally), but you do on the Tube and in central London. Not this year, however.
Granted, there has been a decline post-pandemic, but it occurred to me today that I haven't seen a single other poppy on public transport this year. Indeed, I've seen only two other people wearing poppies (both elderly): one in a shop and another at a bus stop. Obviously, this is just the journeys I've taken. Tonight I've been in Bethnal Green, in a bustling pub and later queuing in a very busy chippy. Again, not a poppy in sight, which seems unusual. I wonder whether there is a reason for this trend.
Remembrance isn't about wearing something on your chest, and I'm sure plenty of people will be remembering, especially over the coming days, regardless of whether they have a poppy on their lapel. So this is definitely not a criticism of anyone (as I say, I'm not keen on poppy policing). But I do find it really odd that I haven't seen poppies anywhere. This has never happened before, certainly not to this extent. I do wonder why, especially as we approach Remembrance Sunday and Armistice Day. It just seems really weird to me.
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
Hallelujah for the Church of England and the Catholic Church standing up for their principles.
The state should not be policing prayer.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
The entire Justice system depends on a postal system that works.
Our postal system is broken.
This is so much bigger than people think.
On hold to @RoyalMail about a missing parcel, and have just been informed by an automated voice that my wait time is 1 hour and 54 minutes… what a scathing indictment of our postal system!! 📮🤣
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
Worth observing, in amongst the undoubted euphoria, that trousers are unisex.
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
2/ In the telegraph article the mother says "During these years, my daughter froze me out of her life. Her friends’ parents thought I was evil and I was flagged to social services on two occasions after her school accused me of abuse."
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
1/ Humanists UK believe they've conducted a "fact check" on a Telegraph piece in which a mother of a trans identifying daughter sets out her fears of the conversion bill.
I intend to defend the mother and her well justified fears in this thread.
humanists.uk/2026/11/05/tele…
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
The Humanists have squandered their once noble reputation. They’re now telling porkies in defence of a law that will stop parents defending their children from “gender medicine” abuse.
1/ Humanists UK believe they've conducted a "fact check" on a Telegraph piece in which a mother of a trans identifying daughter sets out her fears of the conversion bill.
I intend to defend the mother and her well justified fears in this thread.
humanists.uk/2026/11/05/tele…
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
“Soldiers told to avoid Christian ‘elements’ in Acts of Remembrance.”
Read that ☝🏽 again.
An article from 2024 by @StevenEdginton.
The question is: what exactly are we asking people to defend if we’re no longer prepared to defend what makes this country what it is?
telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02…
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
Onward Christian soldiers.
“Soldiers told to avoid Christian ‘elements’ in Acts of Remembrance.”
Read that ☝🏽 again.
An article from 2024 by @StevenEdginton.
The question is: what exactly are we asking people to defend if we’re no longer prepared to defend what makes this country what it is?
telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02…
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
Breaking: An independent KC has concluded files containing bereavement and medical examiners records @nottmhospitals between 2019 and 2022 were “methodically and selectively deleted and that the deletion was intentional rather than accidental.”
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
An organisation rotten to the core. No amount of 'lessons learned' will work here. Only a compete excision of the entire senior management cadre could work. (Oh, and jail time. #calocane )
Breaking: An independent KC has concluded files containing bereavement and medical examiners records @nottmhospitals between 2019 and 2022 were “methodically and selectively deleted and that the deletion was intentional rather than accidental.”
M Chesney-Stroak retweeted
65 years after the Fall of Constantinople, Sultan Selim I Yavuz, grandson of Mehmed "the Conqueror" and father of Suleiman, decided to definitively abolish the Patriarchate of Constantinople during the patriarchate of Theoleptos I, and to slaughter all the subjugated Christians (rayah) of the empire who refused to convert to Mohammedanism and Islam.
The highest religious authority in the Ottoman Empire, Zenbilli Ali Efendi, opposed the Sultan’s decree. He issued a fatwa (legal ruling) stating that according to Islamic law (Sharia), forced conversion is strictly forbidden for non-Muslims who submit to Islamic rule and pay the protection tax (jizya).
But as we know, the Ottomans didn't really care about the taxes. All they wanted was to convert every Greek Christian to Islam, and their actions, according to our primary sources from the last 500 years, are the biggest proof. All you have to do is to read my posts.
The Sultan ordered and implemented the violent Islamization of the Christian Greeks. Just 65 years after the Fall of Constantinople, the Greeks of Thrace were collectively placed before the forced dilemma of either converting or being wiped off the face of the earth, that is, to suffer ethnic cleansing and genocide.
Between those two barbaric options, the Greeks of Thrace (the ancestors of today’s Muslim Greeks of Thrace) chose ethnic cleansing at their own expense; that is, they chose to convert in order to survive as an ancient indigenous people, in the hope that at some point in the future their descendants would regain their national self-awareness and their religious independence, and would then voluntarily return to the bosom of the Greek Nation and of Greek Orthodoxy.
Ottoman expansion was primarily a result of racial and religious grand plan. Just like the genocide of the Christian population of Anatolia (Greeks, Armenians and Assyrians) 100 years ago by the muslim Turks. A genocide and expulsion motivated by racial and religious hatred.
Greece experienced almost 400 years of Ottoman slavery, during which Muslim Turks tortured, murdered, and raped countless thousands of Greeks, targeting them solely for their religion and ethnicity, with the sole aim of forcing them to change their faith and convert to Islam. The entire modern history of Greece, from the fall of Constantinople until 1822, is filled with events of hatred by Islam toward Christianity and Greeks.
And I have not even mentioned the Janissaries.
After the failure of Daskalogiannis’s uprising in Sfakia (1770), whom the Turks flayed alive as I wrote you in my previous post, the life of the rayah (Christian subjects) in Crete became a constant torment. The Janissaries rebelled constantly and imposed their will even on the Pasha. Not only did they seize all the Christians’ belongings, but they also exterminated them without any reason, simply because they were Christians. Sometimes they executed them in cold blood in the middle of the road, just to test the accuracy of their weapons; other times to watch them writhe in their own blood; sometimes to make the abduction of a bride, right after her wedding, more dramatic; other times simply because the Christians were manly-looking, relatively well-dressed, or on horseback. In the latter case, the rayah would hurry to dismount upon seeing a Janissary, but the latter would draw his pistol and say: "Why did you dismount, you infidel dog? So you could make me ride instead?" And the rayah, the Greek Christian, would fall dead.
When bloodthirsty Janissaries held the upper hand, the murder of a Turk was punished extremely harshly by them. Many times it led to the extermination of entire families in the area where the murder had taken place. A characteristic example of their vengeful fury is the fact that, for the murder of one powerful Turk in the Selino region of Crete, 40 Greeks who bore the name Yannis (John) were killed.
In the last quarter of the 18th century, the situation in Crete was grim. The Janissaries faced no restraint in their behavior toward the Christians. They would even enter churches and desecrate them. And if they discovered a beautiful Greek girl, they would seize her from her parents in order to satisfy their lewd desires. For this reason, anyone who had a pretty daughter was forced to keep her locked inside the house, while most Greek women who lived in towns would wear a burqa when they went out, just like Muslim women.
That's why today in Greece, we call the traitors Janissaries which is the ultimate insult for a Greek who acts against his people.
The Greeks suffered so much for 400 years that when they finally fell upon the Turks with rage, there were moments that they would shoot with their rifles, and without waiting to reload the rifles (because it takes time), they would smash the Turks’ heads with their pistols. There are eyewitness, historical accounts, describing how they beat the Turkish occupier with such hatred for what he had done to the Greeks that the iron of the weapons literally melted on the Turks’ heads from the force of the blows.
In Anogeia, Crete, out of the 800 dead Turks, two-thirds had their skulls completely crushed from the blows.
If you want to support me in the effort I’m making, please consider becoming a subscriber to my X account for only $2. I write about the ancient, medieval, and modern history of Greece and what Christians went through because of Islam. Always with primary sources and historical facts.
- Homer Pavlos


































