sudo (@beyondwudan) header
sudo (@beyondwudan) profile picture

AI, biology, whatever I’m into.

Joined May 2025
Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)Photo by sudo (@beyondwudan)
Fable 5.5 and @threejs in a single HTML file!
Is Opus 5.5 routing to a new bigger model? As voxel king speculated, I was ought to try it out, left - Opus 5.5 max on release week, majestic! right - Opus 5.5 high today, majestic final part only! more differences below ↓
5
3
2
109
6,215
Told ya Crouton was a Muse model :)
Crouton Alpha is no where near Pulse Alpha... Although it one shotted it and did very little browser verification on its output, Pulse spent most of the time doing browser verification and perfecting its output. Pulse seems a bit reckless like DeepSeek while Crouton seems pretty chill and not that good in 3D as if it were a Meta Muse model.
9
Tibo in all hopes of scraping Plus
Would a Pro 50 make sense? Wdyt?
1
146
Why are people saying Tencent Hy4 is really good at 3D? This is Hy4 high vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max making a self contianed HTML using @threejs. - Hy4 high: ~55 min, $1.38, 18.89M tokens incl. cache - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max: ~3h 13m, $1.22, 143.88M tokens incl. cache
2
204
GPT Images 2.6
1
2
280
Crouton Alpha is no where near Pulse Alpha... Although it one shotted it and did very little browser verification on its output, Pulse spent most of the time doing browser verification and perfecting its output. Pulse seems a bit reckless like DeepSeek while Crouton seems pretty chill and not that good in 3D as if it were a Meta Muse model.
1
1
8
1,281
I love how new models communicate!
3
107
gpt plus is still scamming us, 13 minutes of codex ate my entire 5h limit GPT 6.1 Sol xhigh, fast mode, 1 main + 2 subagents 5h window: 0% to 100% in 13.2 min weekly: 17% to 33% the thinking only cost $0.28. the real burn was codex re-reading ~170k tokens of context on every step, in 3 agents at once if you're on plus: - turn fast mode off for long tasks, it doubles every token - don't fork subagents with full history, mine started at 113k-141k tokens instead of ~20k
GPT Plus is the biggest scam of all time🤡 Ran GPT 6.1 Terra max in codex, same prompt, normal vs fast normal: 15m53s, 81.5 tok/s, $0.71 fast: 17m02s, 79.0 tok/s, $1.81 fast costs 2x, got slower and same tok/s @thsottiaux you should probably retire the Plus plan now, we go thru all the bs, 5h limit, no doubled usage, no dots, no GPT Pro models
23
1
2
72
11,479
New OpenAI model gpt-icantypeanything-uguysareretards available in codex!!!!! 😮😱
6
180
but whyy 😭
you can now use your claude subscription in OpenCode
1
305
I can imagine the unemployment rate in India people will do anything to make a point and prove you wrong 😂
As I was reading this reply.... openrouter.ai/anthropic/clau… sometimes, its ok to accept that you are humbled and move on. What are you kind of high are on when you are saying you saw Sonnet at 150 Tokens/second and Haiku on 250 Tokens/second. Cleary your mod or whatever that is displaying the speed is not correct, fix that to see the correct numbers.
2
108
GPT Plus is the biggest scam of all time🤡 Ran GPT 6.1 Terra max in codex, same prompt, normal vs fast normal: 15m53s, 81.5 tok/s, $0.71 fast: 17m02s, 79.0 tok/s, $1.81 fast costs 2x, got slower and same tok/s @thsottiaux you should probably retire the Plus plan now, we go thru all the bs, 5h limit, no doubled usage, no dots, no GPT Pro models
GPT 6.1 Terra max vs GPT 6.1 Terra max fast in codex normal: 15m53s, 81.5 tok/s, $0.71 fast: 17m02s, 79.0 tok/s, $1.81 same prompt, fast costs 2x and came out slower fast mode on plus is doing nothing bro. either it's not working or @thsottiaux is lying to plus users 🤡 (api-equivalent cost, i'm on plus)
20
9
4
338
43,105
GPT 6.1 Terra max vs GPT 6.1 Terra max fast in codex normal: 15m53s, 81.5 tok/s, $0.71 fast: 17m02s, 79.0 tok/s, $1.81 same prompt, fast costs 2x and came out slower fast mode on plus is doing nothing bro. either it's not working or @thsottiaux is lying to plus users 🤡 (api-equivalent cost, i'm on plus)
2
2
25
27,856
Tibo didn't post todays good new and @grok @bot is also down, bad day in a long time :(
1
1
233
GPT 6.1 Terra max vs GPT 5.6 Terra max in Codex 5.6: ~22mins, 6.56M tokens, ~$2.42 6.1: ~16mins, 5.79M tokens, ~$0.71 I am genuinely thinking of re-running 6.1 because this output seems unnatural for a model this good.
9
64
14,070
obsidian 3 isn't fable 5.5, my bet is it's an opus 5.6 checkpoint it showed up hidden in cognition's frontiercode 2.0 data.json, and now it's gone from the live file 🫣 high: 46.8% xhigh: 45.9% max: 45.5% opus 5.5 max: 45.5% it only runs in the claude code harness, so it's anthropic it lands right next to opus 5.5, not a big jump like a new fable would be and it gets worse the more you let it think, feels like an early checkpoint could be wrong, dyor tho
2
1
4
667
🚨 Obsidian 3 is hidden model in FrontierCode 2.0 This is the highest scoring model : what can it be < a Fable 5.5 or something else> Harness: it runs on claude-code, which only the six Claude models use Price level: it costs about 3.6× what Opus 5.5 costs at the same effort.
1
65
GPT 6.1 Terra max in pi vs Codex pi: ~58m, 5.14M tokens, ~$0.85 Codex: ~16m, 5.79M tokens, ~$0.71 Codex is way faster tho, pi's scene is better :)
6
1
45
5,870
Guys this is your sign to watch @theo's videos more carefully WTF is restful walrus 😂
1
1
3
180