🚫No DM’s!’ Louisiana, Pro 2A 🔫Conservative /Firearms Enthusiasts/My dogs love me / Thinking for myself.
Baton Rouge, LA
Joined May 2020
- Tweets4.3K
- Following7.4K
- Followers6.8K
- Likes21.4K
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
Sorry, but anyone who backs @AbdulElSayed, whether gleefully or reluctantly, is running with the devil and should be driven out of polite society. Terrorism apologists and those who support them put our country at risk!
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
Hello Alex Alex Alex,
Let me summarize the book UNELECTED in a nutshell.
The Industrial Revolution created a class of private citizens with unimaginable wealth. Many were reviled as robber barons (e.g., Rockefeller of Standard Oil). Others had a better image, like Andrew Carnegie.
These new rich decided because they had money, they had a responsibility to do good by the world. So they started building global philanthropic networks that could go into every country. In order to do so, they hired Department of State and Department of War and other state officials.
They quickly took over the country's education system starting in the 1920s to train them in the "international mind."
When the intelligence community truly sprang up in World War II, the IC hired from ... these same shadowy philanthropic networks. And after WWII, they all coalesced on the same goal: the best chance at achieving a human utopia is to bring the entire world to "democracy."
Except it turns out converting countries to democracy isn't so simple as just financing CIA coups. Did all those NGOs question their own assumption might be flawed - that not every peoples, not every culture and religion is compatible with "democracy"?
No. Instead, the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s concluded that a more technocratic route was necessary. And over many iterations - the Balkans and African adventures of the 90s, the Iraq & Afghanistan ventures, Arab Spring and color revolutions ... every failed iteration of "democracy" always resulted in the same conclusion: the people are dumb, we have to try harder, put more pressure on them, tighten the screws.
And now you have become fully self-referential. Anyone who disagrees with you is "authoritarian." Anyone who agrees with you is "our democracy." Voting methods doesn't matter. That the judiciary system blatantly stole the election doesn't matter.
And nowhere this is more obvious in your 30th anniversary publication.
In your 30th anniversary publication, you had an article from your longtime head of Open Society Fund-Serbia, Sonja Licht. She also happens to be one of the most decorated civilians in Europe and widely considered an expert in "democracy:"
🔹 Pro Merit Medal of the Council of Europe
🔹 Star of Italian Solidarity
🔹 French Legion of Honour
Her solution: "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate, with their active involvement in public life, can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections... spearhead... our struggle to survive."
Read that again.
The idea of democracy as pushed by the head of one of your foundations is to literally stop "election results" and to have the public cede their trust to a technocratic elite.
End democracy to save democracy itself.
This is the final form of a project that started a hundred years ago to spread free markets and create global peace and instill self-governance throughout the world.
This is your legacy, Alex Soros.
Your father spent his life fighting Communism.
You, as his protege, will spend your life perfecting Communism.
In the name of "democracy."
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
The best endorsement of the effectiveness of Harmeet Dhillon at DOJ: that Eric Holder is trashing her priorities and staff. Holder used the Civil Rts Div as a cudgel for the Left. Harmeet investigates clear constitutional and statutory abuses.
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
Unreal…
Elon: Don’t use Starlink to kill people.
Zelensky: I used Starlink to kill people.
Legacy Media: Elon is a monster for stopping Zelensky from using Starlink to kill people.
Democrats: We must investigate Elon for stopping Zelensky from using Starlink to kill people.
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
You mean for doing EXACTLY what Congress gave it the authority to do in the INA?
Odd.
It's federal law.
DHS isn't a travel agency. Illegal aliens don't get to pick where they want to go if they are unwilling to go back to their home country.
And they certainly don't get to do the one thing Congress forbade -- remain in the U.S.
For months, 60 Minutes has been investigating the U.S. government's practice of deporting some immigrants to nations other than their home countries, places where they often have no connection whatsoever.
Our reporting found that some deportees sent to third countries ultimately wound up in places where U.S. judges have ruled they would likely be persecuted or tortured. An immigration lawyer tells 60 Minutes that may be a violation of international law.
Gianna Toboni has that story Sunday at 7 p.m. ET on 60 Minutes.
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
Regarding the $1.8 billion fraud busts yesterday involving medical professionals.
This kind of fraud has been going on for 30+ years that I know of -- and I'm sure it didn't start only when I joined DOJ in 1992.
Trillions of dollars that were supposedly spend on health care for the poor and elderly have been lost to fraudsters over the decades.
And a huge chunk of that money was lost to foreign organized crime groups.
When the U.S. Govt is just giving money away under idiotic rationalizations with little or no verification that the services were actually rendered or that the patients really benefitted, then the criminals of the world will sprint to our doorstep and take what is being offered.
The kind of work-ethic that has built the United States over more than 2 centuries is completely foreign to most cultures around the world where the survival instinct trumps all. And that instinct has led to cultural norms that say it's ok to steal if the alternative is to starve.
What constitutes "starvation" can have a variety of points of view.
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
The Left in this country today is an extended Manson Family of corrupt Robespierre wannabes without the intellect or charisma, and will keep trying to overturn the will of the voters by ANY means including targeted kinetic ones, while shouting about "Love" and yelling "Democracy"
My For You page is flooded with Democrate bull crap. I wonder if X if doing the same for those on the other side?
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
As Secretary Rubio warned in July, we are witnessing the resurgence of FAR-LEFT POLITICAL TERRORISM. Secretary Rubio presciently hosted a Ministerial on this because this threat is transnational and organized in networks that cross borders, share resources, and coordinate violence.
Those who excuse, normalize and legitimize it deserve unequivocal condemnation. If you claim to stand for working people, STOP MAKING EXCUSES FOR THOSE WHO DESTROY EVERYTHING WORKING PEOPLE HAVE BUILT.
Unlike their apologists, we believe destruction and chaos are NOT legitimate forms of political expression. Arson is not argument. Intimidation is not debate. Terror is not justice. And a campaign to destroy Western civilization is NOT a protest against the price of groceries. Every business burned is someone's life's work destroyed. Every neighborhood terrorized is a community robbed of peace.
Under President Trump and Secretary Rubio, we will never surrender American communities to organized political terror. We will dismantle terrorist networks that threaten our people, disrupt their financing, and bring their perpetrators to justice.
Our streets belong to our citizens. Our future belongs to our children. And this country belongs to the people who built it—not transnational mobs that seek to burn it down.
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
Let's review Elissa's work history and see how it may fit into all of this ridiculous "pearl-clutching" that we're doing:
1. Served as the Pentagon's point person on the implications of the Arab Spring.
2. Advised senior Defense Department leadership on political changes in the Middle East.
3. Participated in interagency policy discussions about the Arab Spring.
4. Developed recommendations concerning political reform and its risks throughout the region.
The "Arab Spring" was a wave of anti-government protests, uprisings, and revolutions that swept across the Middle East and North Africa beginning in December 2010.
What began as protests against corruption, authoritarian rule, unemployment, and economic hardship ultimately resulted in the overthrow of several governments, prolonged civil wars, and major changes in the region's political landscape.
Seems like old dogs really can't learn new tricks in Elissa's case. She and her Democrat / DSA collegues are trying to do an "Arab Spring" on those of us who voted for and support what President Trump is doing.
So, as opposed to putting out a better argument as to WHY we should elect people like her, the better option for her and the Democrats at large is to threaten those who vote for the opposition party and set election laws to keep them in power in perpetuity - just like Maduro or any third-world dictator.
Listen to their words. Look at their actions. This is what they absolutely want to do, and they have people like Elissa with her expertise in political upheaval for the sake of overthrowing governments to help...
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
Sen. @ElissaSlotkin, nice try rewriting the record.
On September 30, you warned that authoritarian governments use fear as a weapon.
On October 13, you said you wanted to send a “deterrence message” to young people considering jobs in the Trump administration.
Now you’re hiding behind the rule of law, pretending you were merely talking about prosecuting crimes.
Nobody disputes that criminals should be prosecuted. I know that better than most.
The issue is your stated desire to make young Americans afraid of working for a political administration you oppose.
You warned Americans about politicians using fear. Then you openly advocated using fear yourself.
Your words, Senator. Not somebody else’s interpretation.
Spare me the pearl-clutching — especially from Republican Members of Congress and online MAGA grifters who have cheered President Trump's weaponization of the government against those he doesn’t like, as recently as last week. This is a subject I know something about: Less than a year ago, Trump directed the DOJ and FBI to investigate me, and then tried to criminally indict me for a 90 second video, exercising basic free speech. The same free speech you’re exercising now, lying about what I said in this clip. If not for an anonymous group of grand jury members standing up for America's laws, I’d be criminally indicted for sedition. President Trump has turned the government against people, with raucous support from you and virtually all D.C. Republicans. So spare us the manufactured outrage.
America must be a place where the rule of law still matters. Those laws should apply to everyone equally. If you have aided in the corrupt use of U.S. taxpayer dollars to benefit the President or his family, or you have violated the law in order to carry out guidance from the President, you should be held accountable. And given how rampant that corruption appears to the average American, people looking to work for his Administration should realize that while the Supreme Court has granted the President immunity, it has not done the same for those who do illegal things at his behest.
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
What exactly does Barack Obama know about what Ilhan Omar’s father represented on immigration documents and its veracity or lack thereof, or about whether Ilhan Omar was actually eligible for automatic naturalization, or about whether investigators/prosecutors are pursuing a million other threads around immigration fraud, marriage fraud, perjury, conspiracy to commit crimes, financial improprieties, ties to foreign actors, or a million other potential issues that have been made to let lie thanks to a protective bubble created by the likes of Barack Obama.
In fact, I have a chapter in my book from six years ago — laying out Ilhan Omar’s alleged corruption, criminality, and collusion with our enemies — in which I explain how Barack Obama enabled Ilhan Omar’s rise.
And too enabled the rise of Mamdani, El-Sayed, and myriad other America-haters and would be America-destroyers.
Perhaps the chickens are coming home to roost. amzn.to/2T93JwH
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
@FelixP🇺🇸 retweeted
She married her brother
You attempted to overthrow a duly elected President
You both belong in jail
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.