Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
He who would do good to another, must do it in Minute Particulars
General Good is the plea of the scoundrel hypocrite & flatterer:
For Art & Science cannot exist but in minutely organized Particulars
And not in generalizing Demonstrations of the Rational Power.
-- William Blake
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
The contagion of fear
bcantrill.dtrace.org/2026/09…
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
This entire discussion is just so ludicrous
a) if you believe it is existentially dangerous, put in actual controls with a real regulatory body. Lock that shit down.
b) if you don’t, chill the fuck out. Or treat like the Internet
c) there is no c
I’m solidly in (b).
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
North American country names after deleting “N”, “O”, “R”, “T”, “H”, “A”, “M”, “E”, “R”, “I”, “C”, “A”
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
There may not be many people left in 10 years who can write, or want to read, things longer than a page or two. But there will be at least a few of us, and we'll be a powerful club.
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
On recruiting great ppl:
- great people are (a) rare, and (b) always have tons of options
- therefore once you decide a candidate is great you cannot hesitate or delay. You must drop everything and rearrange heaven and earth to get them
- there are small things (sending flowers), medium things (comp), and big things (their identity and dreams)
- you want the barbell strategy-- put all your energy into small things and big things. Leave medium things till the end
Small things:
- ppl massively underestimate the power of small gestures. TL;DR: love-bomb the candidate
- spend more time than money. Expense accounts are abundant but time is scarce. It's an expensive signal no one can fake
- stay in close contact over text and phone
- send them a first edition used book or an analog oscilloscope or some other random thing they mentioned in passing they like. Make these unique, everyone sends wine
- invite them to computer history museum or moma or something. Spend time with them! Treat these meetings as dates, make them unique. Everyone buys dinner
- be persistent but not annoying. Sometimes ppl need time alone, you should respect that.
Big things:
- there is a gap between what the candidate is doing in life and how they see themselves in the privacy of their dreams. Your job is to help them bridge this gap
- to bridge the gap you must first understand it. Take the candidate on walks to museums and parks. Walks help the candidate drop their guard so you can learn about them. Try hard to get to know them, to understand their dreams
- use your mission, your culture, your people, your company to paint a world for them in which the gap no longer exists. You may need to adjust the role or even change it altogether. For great ppl it is worth it
- don't assume ppl want what you want, dreams can take all kinds of shapes. Maybe they want their work to matter, maybe they want a bigger team, maybe they want to code and avoid meetings, maybe they want to be in the center of the action, maybe they want to learn, maybe all or some or none of the above. Find out!
Medium things (aka closing):
- you've constructed a world the candidate is excited to live in. The purpose of this phase is to remove mundane obstacles to make this world easy to enter
- I don't think I ever sold a candidate on a dream and then lost them on comp. Ppl just want to be compensated fairly and work out some life constraints
- I don't have much to add to all the comp advice out there. My philosophy on comp/closing is to get this part done and move on, don't penny pinch too much, and give more equity
---
Failure modes/don't do this:
- do not ignore candidate's spouse/parents. They have an outsized role in the decision. Most of what I said about the candidate applies to them too (love bomb them, understand their dreams, etc.)
- counterintuitive, but do not talk about the company or even the mission too much. The candidate and their dreams are front and center. At this stage you, the role, the mission are only relevant to the degree they can make candidate's dreams come true
- same w/ perks, what the day is like, etc. Don't blindly talk about these-- use them as tools to reenforce how the candidate seems themselves
- don't get mad if ppl reject you, it happens. Maybe it's not a fit for them now but will be a great fit four years from now. Maybe they become a customer. Maybe you work for them ten years later. Play the long game.
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
Major news: SF's most infamous empty car wash will finally start to become housing this year.
The empty car wash on 400 Divis has become a symbol of San Francisco's stalled housing pipeline. So it's no accident that this same project will be one of the first housing projects to break ground in District 5 in my first term, due to the city's concerted action.
Since taking office, we've partnered with the developer to write legislation that fixed technicalities in our building code and save housing projects like the one on 400 Divis millions of dollars in potential costs. We've worked alongside the Mayor's office and OEWD to reduce impact fees further to get to financial feasibility.
That this project is on track to now break ground this year is a direct result of those efforts.
A longtime source of blight on Divisadero is about to become a beacon of economic activity, and home to hundreds of new residents. And we're just getting started. More major housing updates in the months ahead.
sfchronicle.com/sf/article/a…
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted

Ficus Kirkpatrick@ficusAug 7
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Replying to @__lodestone__
The purpose of an OS is to provide an execution environment with a particular set of invariants / guarantees. This encompasses everything from "you can't read another process's memory" to "there is a consistent way to ask the user for money".
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
To sum up my thoughts to some FAQs, here's how I'm thinking about the Vulnpocalypse. We are in a discovery surge that's dropping the bug bounty prices. In this "deep clean" phase developers will address a lot of tech debt, but this will fall off at some point, especially as AI costs drop and we can put AI-driven vuln scanning into the SDLC at-scale. There's a healthy equilibrium in the 12-18 month timeframe (conceptual graph) -- these are my views, YMMV.
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
Happy 35th Anniversary World Wide Web. On August 6, 1991, info.cern.ch went live. We all owe @timberners_lee a big thank you!
(recreated home page via info.cern.ch)
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
In my view we have a few different tiers of verifiability
1) programatically verifiable (near-free)
- games, coding, math, cybersecurity, chip design
2) real-world verifiable (cost-or time bounded)
- sciences: biology, chemistry, physics
-physical world: material science, energy, aerospace, robotics, agriculture, pharma
-forecasting: trading, weather
3) verifiable with human preference
- writing, design, comedy, charisma, persuasion
I expect most low-hanging fruit in (1) to be solved very quickly. Not sure how much longer before more solved math conjectures are simply uninteresting. I’m least certain about chip design being in this category, perhaps we hit a ceiling and require physics or materials breakthroughs to continue progress.
My guess is we will quickly run into the limits of how well we can simulate each domain in (2). The time-bounded nature of real world verification may be the reason we don’t hit fast takeoff. Sim2real remains an elusive problem to solve when real-world data is limited. Part of the reason I don’t expect to live multiple hundreds of years is simply that I expect pharmaceutical progress to be time-bounded by the physical world.
I expect the items in (3) to never really get solved to a superhuman degree, as success relies on an ever-shifting plane of cultural preference. People adapted to “good” AI writing and became annoyed at new stylistic tics that, in a vacuum, are not necessarily bad.
Well, if anyone still needed proof that every verifiable domain will eventually fall to AI, this feels like it.We’re not talking about a model built specifically for mathematics. It’s a general model proving genuinely new theorems.
The craziest part isn’t even today’s result. It’s that the same level of capability that costs a few thousand dollars today will likely cost a few cents in a few years. Once that happens, we’ll have millions of these systems searching for new knowledge 24/7 across math, physics, biology, chemistry, and every other domain where ideas can be verified.
For centuries, science scaled with the number of scientists. Soon, it will scale with compute and a lot of compute is coming online!
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted
In general I've come to think people should be skeptical of anything that's narratively satisfying
Replying to @AndyMasley
I've become extremely suspicious of any claim that [good thing] is actually bad because of second order effects. Almost every time I look into it I find that the negative second order effect is real but swamped by the [good thing] working as intended.
Ficus Kirkpatrick retweeted

the tiny corp@__tinygrad__Jul 28
United States
United StatesConnected via WebAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
The limiting factor of software engineering has never been code production. It is complexity management.




























