This is….. For one, “genocide” is not a “liberal term,” nor does it reduce our struggle to a humanitarian crisis (I mean, what?!) Genocide implies both the existence of a culprit and the need for punishment; two conditions that make the argument presented in this video invalid. Secondly, I’m not sure if this is an attempt at criticizing/highlighting the uselessness international law, but what comes across is a needless effort to complicate/problematize a framework that is already made marginal by the ruling class: maybe you think the word “genocide” as it relates to Gaza has become mainstream, because of the bubbles we inhabit, but the truth of the matter is that the majority of the world’s powers are yet to officially acknowledge genocide, (because acknowledging it means having to do something about it etc.), and so the argument in this video is inadvertently in service of the status-quo, not a disruption to it. We don’t need to do all this.