WHAT DO WE WANT? MOON WAR! WHEN DO WE WANT IT? NOW!

Cape Canaveral, FL
Joined July 2026
It's an excellent development that we took space exploration out of the hands of people like this.
"So you oppose exploration?" "No. I want a destination, a budget, and a reason that survives a follow-up question"
2
1
27
483
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
Hippity hoppity your spectrum is now my property 😂
SpaceX has just officially received FCC approval to acquire three additional spectrum licenses from Tristar to expand its upcoming next-gen @Starlink Mobile network. The licenses cover 15 MHz of spectrum in the 1695–1710 MHz band. The FCC also granted waivers allowing SpaceX to use the spectrum for satellite communications instead of building traditional cell towers. This approval comes just two weeks after SpaceX announced an agreement to acquire nationwide 800 MHz low-band spectrum to improve indoor coverage and outlined plans to combine its satellite constellation with terrestrial infrastructure. Starlink Mobile will become the first network operator to deploy both satellite and terrestrial spectrum: "One network that provides Americans with a reliable service indoors, outdoors, in cellular dead zones, and everywhere in between."
1
31
517
How is this not just wishful thinking?
It would not surprise me to see news sometime in the next year that SpaceX is simply withdrawing from the Artemis program, as it focus is more being a telecommunications and AI company.
3
12
615
You know, back in 2020, Blue Origin really thought they had HLS in the bag. That's why their bid was so high, they treated it like a sole source contract. They lost, bigtime, and it was crushing. I'm not saying history repeats itself, I'm just saying it can rhyme.
5
61
Yeah bro they will fly the more expensive and less capable vehicle a LOT more.
HLS will be an Amazing Cargo Vehicle, but in my Opinion, when Artemis Transitions from a Lunar Construction Program to a Routine Human Base, I think Blue Moon will be seeing a Lot More Use, especially when ISRU Refueling is Introduced
1
7
247
This is just Vulcan all over again. "Workhorse of the 2020s" lmfao
3
29
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
Artemis II was not Apollo 8 either. At NASA, we are making the most of architecture decisions made, for better or worse, over decades. Regardless of the state of the lander, we must launch annually and keep moving in the direction of the Moon. Delaying for a perfect set of objectives doesn't make the rocket cost less, achieve the overall Artemis goals faster, or make anything safer. When the LEM wasn't ready, NASA changed Apollo 8 from an Earth-orbit test of the lander to a mission around the Moon, moving the lander test to Apollo 9. When Gemini VI's Agena target failed, we pulled Gemini VII to the left and had Gemini VI to rendezvous with it. In both cases, NASA adapted to circumstances, made the most of what was available, and kept moving forward. Some people choose to make this about their affinity for certain hardware, or equally, their distaste for certain hardware or people or companies, but it should be about what advances America's space program...and that is what Artemis III will do.
4
23
2
173
4,363
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
The uproar over SpaceX phasing out Falcon 9 is just absurd, people have watched SpaceX and spaceflight for the past decade yet still don't understand how they operate Starship will achieve Falcon 9 like cadence next year, cheaper launch cost, full reuse, and higher payload to LEO Why would SpaceX want to keep the inferior rocket (Falcon 9) around for much longer? Starship already has contracts to deploy payloads so all the idiotic arguments of "they won't make a non Starlink payload bay until the 2030s" are thrown out the window This is like complaining that NASA stopped flying Titan II Gemini missions once Saturn V was up and running
scoop: SpaceX declined to offer Falcon for three future Space Force missions, and no other company offered to fly them either — an early sign of the launch crunch politico.com/news/2026/10/22…
14
13
207
4,779
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
We are launching the Tesla Robotaxi safety report today. Till date, Robotaxi has driven a total of 3.3 million miles autonomously, and has had zero injuries nor airbag deployments. If the same number of miles were to be manually driven, we should expect roughly 9 injuries to the occupants or other pedestrians and 4 airbag deployments on average. We will continue to transparently share our progress with the public using this page. tesla.com/robotaxi/safety
282
1,374
180
10,920
318,166
Gee I wonder if they have some kind of new rocket they intend to replace Falcon 9 with.
SpaceX doesn't want to be bothered anymore with these it seems like...
3
1
30
853
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
Launch Crunch Wrap Supreme™️
scoop: SpaceX declined to offer Falcon for three future Space Force missions, and no other company offered to fly them either — an early sign of the launch crunch politico.com/news/2026/10/22…
1
7
380
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
BREAKING: The U.S. Space Force says America needs a THIRD major rocket launch range by 2030 as military and commercial launch demand accelerates. Lt. Gen. Philip Garrant, commander of Space Systems Command, confirmed that the service has formed a planning team to evaluate a new spaceport capable of supporting medium- and heavy-lift rockets. The expansion would supplement Cape Canaveral in Florida and Vandenberg in California, which face growing capacity constraints as SpaceX, Blue Origin and other operators increase launch activity. The White House has projected that U.S. launch demand could reach 1,000 missions annually by 2030, approximately five times the 2025 level. The Space Force is evaluating government-owned facilities, commercial property and public-private partnerships. Garrant described the 2030 timeline as ambitious. No location or construction plan has been finalized. A third launch range could provide additional capacity and redundancy for deploying military satellites during a crisis.
37
45
10
388
19,388
The article hints but does not say explicitly that SpaceX offered Starship. I am really not sure why people think SpaceX won't be able to put in a door. There are payloads on the manifest that require one.
scoop: SpaceX declined to offer Falcon for three future Space Force missions, and no other company offered to fly them either — an early sign of the launch crunch politico.com/news/2026/10/22…
6
42
1,088
A new high profile missions slide has been published. While the Starship launch dates remain the same, New Glenn's return to flight has been added with a NET date of December 28 compass.atfm.aero/public_svc…
2
9
285
If they get within 5 months of that date and fly successfully it will be easily the most heroic pad recovery effort of all time.
4
31
holy fucking shit dude
420 - October 21, 2026
1
11
680
This quoted post is unavailable.
2
43
423
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
Elon Musk hilariously explains why Optimus has to learn like a toddler, by playing, making mistakes and getting better over time 😂 “In order for Optimus to get the training data we need, we actually need to make a lot of Optimi. So we need to make, I think, on the order of 10,000 or 20,000 bots and then have them do self-play. We're building up an Optimus academy where Optimus can practice doing a very wide range of tasks And then we can use that data in a flywheel to make it better and better at these various tasks, a big difference with Optimus versus the cars Is we don't have this vast fleet of cars from which we can gather training data. So with Optimus, we have to bootstrap it by making the robots and having them do self-play, which is really how a human learns to navigate the world You can see this when you have a toddler and they grow up and they initially are wobbly and they don't know how to do things, and eventually they, they learn to wipe their own ass, which is a big milestone, because anyone who's had kids knows And then they learn to read and do all sorts of things and be able to do these things. And they learn this by playing And we actually need Optimus to play at scale in order to have it be really good at tasks in the real world”
249
531
62
4,247
483,996
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
Ship 43 has left Megabay 2 Track Starbase Here: figma.com/design/2AvC161FuB1… Join Our Discord Here: discord.gg/ZbrSYPzDAq 📸@NASASpaceflight | Starbase Live | nsf.live/starbase #Tracking #Starship #Starbase #SpaceX
1
8
159
2,373
🎃MOON WAR NOW🎃 retweeted
Me. Deciding which password to use for the Internet. 4
4
27
436