「 𝐙ʏᴘʜᴇʀᴘᴜɴᴋ」 「𝔯𝔢𝔪𝔦𝔩𝔦𝔞 𝔞𝔰𝔰𝔢𝔱 𝔥𝔬𝔞𝔯𝔡𝔢𝔯」「Ξ𝕞𝕒𝕩𝕚」

Milady World Computer
Joined April 2023
Selling Zcash today is like selling Bitcoin at $1300
80
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
Congrats to Ulrich, Luke, and Suyash (great cryptographers from StarkWare and Aztec) who are joining Shielded Labs to work on post-quantum research for Zcash! They're just the latest in a string of high-caliber folks joining Zcash over the past year. LFG!
17
54
9
431
20,534
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
been thinking more on coherent messaging re: NEAR let's ideate from first principles: - the product of capitalism is markets - capitalism -> markets -> competition -> specialization -> fragmentation - within the specializations, there will be dominant leaders in each category - SoV: gold, zec, btc - trading: solana, hyperliquid, robinhood, binance - currencies: usd, eur, gbp - and on it goes: ai inference, private compute, real estate, international stocks, metals, e-commerce yada yada - this requires connective tissue, which has been traditionally served via something like binance - but one centralized company can not serve this need for infinite markets. there are too many handicaps, lack of network effects, and singular points of risk and stoppage. this is a rare case of decentralization being necessary. neutrality is non-negotiable for unstoppable global trade. - now, you may see where I'm going and say: well Ethereum and Cosmos already tried this. but that's wrong. what they tried to do was structurally flawed - those models required the succeeding nodes (L2s and L3s) to be from within the ecosystem, but that is incoherent since i) you can't force success, ii) if one were to succeed, they would just want to own the platform - the other model is of course the Solana/Hyperliquid model of having everything concentrated on the L1. this model works. however this requires a high-degree of specialization to be competitive. you won't out nasdaq solana. - but, NEAR does not need to do this. where there is concentration, there is also the need for connection. - especially with their chain signature architecture, instead of forcing new internal nodes, they can just discover the successful ones and connect them to each other without ideology (see: NEAR intents supporting ZEC but also ZEC on Solana!) - importantly, this is PvE and not zero sum. the more markets succeed, the more interesting NEAR becomes, i.e if Solana is one continent, and AI another, and Zcash another, then NEAR is the silk road. so I think the coherent message for NEAR is: the market of markets — the capital of capital
I'm not directly involved with near unlike zec & sol, but I've been consistent that it's obviously underrated given what it can do for a while so it's satisfying to see a vibe shift around it if they nail their gtm, decrease distractions, and increase focus, this could be fun
134
180
64
1,283
397,603
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
was trolled for leading zec listing on solana 1y ago now it's the top 3 most traded asset on the chain along with several derivative uses in defi not all things are zero sum. plan to also add a light client between zcash and solana to reduce trust assumptions zolana
141
75
18
1,225
78,049
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
Replying to @Quanterty
$ZEC does not need another thousand people tweeting about privacy. It needs millions of people accidentally discovering why privacy matters. zkSNARKs is showing what that can look like_
16
8
1
92
2,004
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
all celebrations until $10,000 are premature encrypt the money
128
133
18
1,475
93,153
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
If you bought $1000 Litecoin last year today you would have had $500 If you bought $1000 Zcash last year today you would have had $28,000 “No one was using Zcash, right?” $ZEC 🔥
6
5
1
40
8,657
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
I can't sleep at night having my entire networth in $ZEC Because I'm getting DUMB rich
I sleep like a baby at night having my entire networth in $XMR
7
5
1
121
11,102
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
So many people like this guy are experiencing crippling despair because $ZEC is resetting to the price is deserves. Don't be like him. Today is yet another day you can get $ZEC for under $15,000
ZCASH pumping like this is truly unfathomable for anyone from my era (besides tm3k) THE biggest piece of crap on the market this would be like 5 years from now Cardano sends 4000%, legitimately unbelievable
40
13
2
208
36,149
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
What's in your wallet?
38
66
16
475
24,937
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
Source code is no longer a moat. Any code can be quickly replicated. For Zcash, 10 years of fair POW distribution cannot be replicated. And now, the software stack on top is shipping and being optimized faster than you can blink.
26
61
8
391
61,085
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
Zcash $1,000. Zcash $10,000. Zcash $100,000.
Zcash can scale. Zcash must scale. Zcash will scale.
244
366
90
2,804
583,348
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
Introducing Zakura Common. We just shipped 14x faster proving, 21x faster hashing, 1.5x faster trial decryption, and 4-8x faster verification. New releases of Zakura and wallets that use Zakura Common (such as @vizorwallet) will benefit immediately. zakura.com/announcements/zak…
35
83
44
457
182,308
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
Long overdue. Make tokens great again.
We are excited to announce four updates regarding the Ethena ecosystem, further details on each point are provided in the blog linked below: 1. Buyout of early investors: The Ethena Foundation executed a buyout of all locked tokens from certain major seed investors that sold any ENA within the last 9 months. 2. Alignment of Token & Equity: The Ethena Foundation and Ethena Labs have reached agreement on a Master Framework Agreement, whereby IP and ownership of value accrued by the protocol is assigned to the Foundation exclusively and governed by token holders with no residual cash flow due to equity investors in the Labs entity. 3. Revenue Buybacks: Governance proposal now live for the implementation of the fee switch whereby net revenue accrued across all business lines under the Ethena brand will be used to programmatically buy back the ENA token. The vote for revenue buyback fee switch implementation is now here, and has already been approved by the Risk Committee: snapshot.box/#/s:ethenagover… 4. Removal of monthly VC unlocks: The Ethena Foundation and lead investors have agreed to eliminate future overhang associated with monthly VC investor unlocks by releasing unvested tokens. All team tokens remain locked per the original vesting schedules. Further details and documentation is provided in the blog linked below:
66
42
5
732
72,731
- dev should have been allocated ~20% of tokens, vested - token distribution period should've been much longer than 2 weeks - of the 15% fees, half should be used for buybacks, the other half paired with the bought back tokens and added to protocol owned liquidity
These sections of the docs have not changed since a week before launch. Yes, TokenWorks makes money. I'm personally of the belief that if you build an innovative product you should be rewarded, just as traders do. The goal is move future incoming fees (starting tomorrow) from going to TokenWorks to the token and make a sustainable protocol. There is no percentage of retroactive fees that would satisfy everyone. If you were hoping a large portion fees would be used for this I’m sorry, but it was never stated or even hinted at. I also don’t think it would do anything other than temporarily increase the token price, only for people to sell into it. I'd rather use it to keep building the protocol and add new features just like we've been planning from the start. That being said, I do hear the feedback and I know everyone is just speaking from a place of wanting to see the protocol succeed. and for the protocol to succeed, more of the future fees need to stay within the ecosystem. We'll increase the portion of future protocol fees going to buybacks from 50% as announced earlier (currently 0%) up to 80%. This number can always be increased in the future, and does not include the 1% trading fee on the token itself. Since the token was only able to be acquired by participating, TokenWorks currently holds no supply (I personally own around 1%). I do think it makes sense to use a portion of the fees to build a team reserve, and we'll use 10% of the fees accumulated to TokenWorks (not the splitter) thus far to build this. This will not satisfy everyone, but the goal is to show long-term alignment and continue working. Anyway, see you all tomorrow.
1
2
261
「pakuchi」🛡️₊⁺ retweeted
7
8
2
65
22,874
Just submitted my @zksnarks_ application. ZODL! #0047
1
9
312