Replying to @Batuzec
Why would they push a proposal that would be unreasomable and detrimental to Zcash?
Replying to @thefrankbraun
Need coin holder voting to eliminate conflicts of interest of having a centralized committee decide everything
Replying to @maxdesalle @deepcandles
Why is a proposal that got rejected getting any funding at all?
Replying to @LittleSproutGC
What kind of team applies for patents in an industry built on open-source and shared knowledge?
Replying to @Evan_ss6
As a pure spot crypto investor who rebalances maybe 3-4x a year how can Claude max help me? I don’t have a business.
Replying to @123skely
How do I sign transactions and do stuff on chain with this setup?
Replying to @zubic_eth
Vitalik was right in saying pump is a net negative to the space
Replying to @LumiNega @gaijinthoughts
In America you don’t even need ID to vote lol
Congrats to Ulrich, Luke, and Suyash (great cryptographers from StarkWare and Aztec) who are joining Shielded Labs to work on post-quantum research for Zcash!
They're just the latest in a string of high-caliber folks joining Zcash over the past year. LFG!
Replying to @krugman87
Uh not really the funds came from hackers address on eth so its got nothing to do with nears privacy
Replying to @SizeChad
Blockchain fees are not a tax, they are a necessary cost for physical validators to provide decentralization, speed and security.
Replying to @GoodTexture
Shielded Zcash is the only way I send crypto these days so not sure what you’re talking about
Replying to @mk4_lul
I should be eligible, where can I check my allocation?
been thinking more on coherent messaging re: NEAR
let's ideate from first principles:
- the product of capitalism is markets
- capitalism -> markets -> competition -> specialization -> fragmentation
- within the specializations, there will be dominant leaders in each category
- SoV: gold, zec, btc
- trading: solana, hyperliquid, robinhood, binance
- currencies: usd, eur, gbp
- and on it goes: ai inference, private compute, real estate, international stocks, metals, e-commerce yada yada
- this requires connective tissue, which has been traditionally served via something like binance
- but one centralized company can not serve this need for infinite markets. there are too many handicaps, lack of network effects, and singular points of risk and stoppage. this is a rare case of decentralization being necessary. neutrality is non-negotiable for unstoppable global trade.
- now, you may see where I'm going and say: well Ethereum and Cosmos already tried this. but that's wrong. what they tried to do was structurally flawed
- those models required the succeeding nodes (L2s and L3s) to be from within the ecosystem, but that is incoherent since i) you can't force success, ii) if one were to succeed, they would just want to own the platform
- the other model is of course the Solana/Hyperliquid model of having everything concentrated on the L1. this model works. however this requires a high-degree of specialization to be competitive. you won't out nasdaq solana.
- but, NEAR does not need to do this. where there is concentration, there is also the need for connection.
- especially with their chain signature architecture, instead of forcing new internal nodes, they can just discover the successful ones and connect them to each other without ideology (see: NEAR intents supporting ZEC but also ZEC on Solana!)
- importantly, this is PvE and not zero sum. the more markets succeed, the more interesting NEAR becomes, i.e if Solana is one continent, and AI another, and Zcash another, then NEAR is the silk road.
so I think the coherent message for NEAR is:
the market of markets — the capital of capital








