This seems like a sane take. I kind of don't like the idea of carrying around 2x weight if I'm not using the 2x screen much.
Karl Nieberding | Wizard of UX 🪄✨ retweeted
The real scarcity in content creation is not production and editing skills
It’s living an Interesting Life.
Everyone else is mostly rearranging other people’s observations
Karl Nieberding | Wizard of UX 🪄✨ retweeted
iPhone Duo: A Photographer's Review
youtu.be/dxF1r2BMqjU
Karl Nieberding | Wizard of UX 🪄✨ retweeted
Imo one of the reasons the Elizabeth Holmes documentary was so interesting is to see into the psyche of someone with a reality distortion field but it DIDN’T work out
Like people talk about this concept with very successful CEOs and you see it in many ways when they speak publicly
But this was a private look into how someone like that thinks and how it can go awry. Does a great job of showing how self delusion actually manifests and can be powerful or self destructive
I think in today’s startup environment understanding that line has never been more important
Karl Nieberding | Wizard of UX 🪄✨ retweeted
Having daily driven both the Fold 8 and the iPhone Duo for a bit now, the front screen experience is night and day.
The Duo outer display basically feels like an iPhone mini with a leash on it. Tidy, great for quick triage, checking a widget or firing off a quick text, but iOS clearly wants you to unfold the thing the second you want to do anything real.
The Fold 8 front screen, on the other hand, is just outright fun. Proper usable width, no cramped typing, and One UI lets you treat it like a full blown powerhouse. Floating windows, split screen, zero babysitting. Half the time I do not even bother opening the inner display because the front glass does not feel like a compromise.
Apple built a glanceable cover reminding me of flip 8. Samsung built an actual phone.
Maybe magic in the HP universe drains your bank account instead of mana points.
You know, call me a Doylist but I think part of the issue here lies with Rowling, and a plot thread she’s working out that doesn’t always have the practical implications that she wants.
Because mostly everyone’s right: Ron has horrifying robes because the family is poor, which is part of his insecurities and indicative of a number of ongoing plots within his family. Goblet of Fire, after all, is also the book where the Twins seriously consider blackmailing a powerful individual for investment capital and Percy makes a fool of himself trying to impress his boss, setting the stage for his fall out with his parents in Book 5. Ron’s dress robes, as minor a problem as they really are in the grand scheme of things, are a reminder of the material lifestyle his brothers are all trying to escape. And because Ron is fourteen, he doesn’t have the perspective to sit down and go “hey at least I’m not an orphan like Harry here.”
But if you stop and think about it for a moment, why did the robes in question have to stay the way they were bought?
Think about it: Molly is a lifelong champion of domesticity and the household arts. She’s very good at at least one physical domestic craft (knitting). What are the odds she doesn’t know any sewing spells, particularly with seven children to clothe on a budget and the attendant necessity to mend any rips and tears in clothes that children acquire?
Molly also knows what’s going on at Hogwarts this year before Harry and his fellow students do, as Arthur and Percy both work at the Ministry and the latter has probably been working on the last-minute details of the tournament for the past few months. She almost certainly knows when Ron needs the robes by, and it’s not immediately after he arrives at Hogwarts.
So wouldn’t the practical thing to do be to say, “Don’t be stupid, Ron, of course I’m not letting you go out like some out-of-sorts time traveler. I’ll modify the neck and cuffs after the lot of you are out of my hair and send them along in a few weeks?” People alter second-hand clothes all the time; it should be the obvious step to take. Even Ron managed to take the lace off, although he didn’t do it well.
But the point was to drive home how poor the Weasleys are and how the children feel encumbered by it, rather than to apply an ounce of common sense to the problem. And I think that one’s on Rowling.
I think they were in an AirBnB and it had a place those things were stored for the guest to set up for themselves.
A lot of these moments can be edited to seem a lot more rude than they may have been.
Karl Nieberding | Wizard of UX 🪄✨ retweeted
More notes:
I’m ok with the hardware and screens, I’d have preferred a glossy inner screen. It feels like a cheap tablet display. I get that being foldable comes with compromises. The outer screen looks incredible quality though.
No problem with app compatibility, it will improve. But it’s odd that Apple’s own OS and apps struggle with portrait layouts.
Switching between folded, portrait and landscape use is the biggest frustration. Opening it takes too much force and time, feels easy to drop, and I’m constantly hunting for Touch ID :) Face ID feels essential here.
In portrait, my fingers smudge the outer screen. Landscape is mostly useful for videos or apps like Claude Code. Using it lying down is awkward too, and rotation lock doesn’t really help when switching screens.
If it was going to be this awkward to use, they could’ve at least made the outer screen bigger and the phone taller.
To avoid dealing with all this, I spend 80% of my time on the small screen.
I saw YCSE a second time tonight and came away even more siding with Billy and Liz.
I don't think many folks have had the chance to meet actual smart and authentic people who aren't chasing traditional success.
They then keep asking "where is the joke?" when there isn't one.
The special guest (prefer to avoid spoilers still), who I thought was great at first viewing, this time I felt like she immensely tilted the audience frame against the subjects, and overall did a disservice.
Of course, the real subject was Nathan figuring out how to do the film.
"Somebody not pursuing social memesis? Those people don't exist." xitter.cf/ScooterCasterNY/status…
WATCH: Nathan Fielder and Elizabeth Holmes Lookalike Contest Takes Over Washington Square Park
Fans in turtlenecks and blonde wigs packed Washington Square Park in NYC on Sunday for a Nathan Fielder and Elizabeth Holmes lookalike contest decided right in front of the crowd. Winners Joe Sivick and Nicole Travolta and organizers Maddy West and Katherine Gehring talk about the day.
Video: Ken Lopez | Licensing @FreedomNTV [email protected]





















