Replying to @ericnuttall
I do not understand how you get to that 1.6m number
Production data from oilX on the table here below
Estimated Spare sustainable capacity: 2.38mb/d
Replying to @GaryHaubold @OilCfd
In terms of narrative, a lot. In real terms, for now, very little compared to the big picture. around 100/150 kb of gasoil. This is July snapshot for the Top 10 Buyers of Major Russian Oil Products. can't see why @OilCfd is that bullish at these prices
DNΞT retweeted
Happy to present my @HyperliquidX Dashboard 🍌
hyperliquid-analytics.com/
It includes different categories:
⏩Hyperliquid Volume Breakdown
⏩Core vs EVM
⏩Hyperliquid vs CEX (Binance, Bybit, Okx) comparison across different fields
⏩Growth (perps, total protocol, core, etc.)
⏩Token Metrics (Vol, MC, Vol/MC Ratio)
(HYPE, BNB, OKB)
⏩Daily, Weekly, and Monthly comparisons
Replying to @JuneGoh_Sparta
To better understand, why you didn't see much impact on the middle distillates side too in terms of price appreciation considering it produces around 120kbbl/d of diesel? thx in advance
10b FDV is the one implied with the 10 cents otc deals happening on whales market
leeet's see
pro.whales.market/pre/Ethere…
DNΞT retweeted
Poker is one of the most important cheat codes in trading.
Jeff Yass ($59B net worth) trains traders at his $500B+ hedge fund using poker for good reason.
Here are 5 poker concepts that will make you a better trader:
Replying to @tleilax___
I used to filter like this:
so filtering by current coutry and taking into account only malaysia and china. dunno if looking at this one updated you notice any difference in the behaviour
Replying to @tleilax___
no accesso to kpler right now unfort so i was wondering: what about iran and EOPL floating storage instead?
DNΞT retweeted
A post on a true failure in DeFi.
After one year or so without incentives (which revealed there was 0 real user demand for their product) @synthetix is resorting to $SNX token dillution again to drive fake demand for their product.
After 7 years of building they were unable to have users use their product without getting paid for using it.
As a result, capital resumes its flow from investors towards users which is the opposite way of how a business is supposed to function. It is negative value creation.
This protocol has failed and is worth exactly $0 because it creates negative value.
Holding $SNX tokens at any price is misallocation of capital which only serves to further pay for deluded developpers building products and services that no one wants to pay for.
The market should really end this project so that @kain can start doing something productive for society like flipping burgers or smth.
Look at their own admission:
"The harsh reality is that without incentives, it is impossible to compete"
Yeah because the real harsh reality is that your product is worthless and shouldn't be existing and drawing capital away from places in the space where it would be better allocated.
Replying to @Icebergy @GamesMasterFlex
Replying to @choffstein @0xdoug
the problem is that i have no idea (and no one has) of what is the definition of "previous oracle price"
Replying to @choffstein @0xdoug
it's actually in the contract lol
and you agree to their terms by trading there
OI capped but by buying it back they would decrease OI. that's why i do not understand where the flaw is
Replying to @ManInBlackie
Processo logico è: steth e meth vanno a sconto su sell pressure. Arbitrageur comprano i dip con stable , hedgiano eth con perp e vanno di redeem. Quando arrivano eth dumpano spot e smontano hedge . Quindi mi pare come vendere eth alla fine ma solo che è laggato










