Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 (@Bitcoinapolis55) header
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 (@Bitcoinapolis55) profile picture

#₿itcoin Only. 35 year BI/Data Pro. Politically Homeless. MPLS. No c̶r̶y̶p̶t̶o̶. BTC = Money Over IP. Bitcoin Core is still broken. Need a new client

Joined February 2022
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Watching your 12th Bitcoin bull run from the sidelines. Again.
97
157
28
2,167
68,768
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
It’s the war. It’s the blatant corruption. It’s the trade wars. It’s the sucking up to Putin. It’s ICE’s cruelty. It’s the administration’s incompetence. It’s the Epstein files. It’s Trump’s disgraceful behavior in office. It’s a Republican-controlled Congress refusing to hold him accountable. It’s ALL of it. And so much more
JD Vance, in his first statement following last night’s Republican wipeout: “The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.”
81
732
23
4,163
80,269
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Clickbait clown 🤡
Is Bitcoin Dying in El Salvador?
11
96
2,768
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
I wish there was a way for Democrats and Republicans to both lose.
333
479
60
5,329
74,358
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
The number of days Bitcoin was between...
1
1
1
14
1,434
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Holy fucking shit
623
7,842
630
45,832
2,899,918
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Replying to @cryptoRambo10
I asked then to clarify where is the 3/4 of the remaining components required to make such a integrated system work. Power, connectivity, control and monitoring etc. A hashboard is just a piece of such an ntegrated system. Response: picture of a box with parts in it and a block
3
1
12
712
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Spending $10k on a sweater apparently doesn’t make you an expert on quantum and Bitcoin.
57
62
10
759
16,697
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
2
15
79
1,127
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
What happened to Chamath?
389
145
70
2,069
565,688
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Incredible ride in the Tesla Roadster 🤍
33
25
11
376
24,602
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Last week I asked a Bitcoin funding org to consider supporting an initiative. “Probably best for decentralization that we don’t.” “How so?” “You should read stuff from jonatack and hodlonaut and it would explain it.” “Oh that’s silly” “I’m somewhat kidding, but surely you see the irony.” Fortunately, funding has been decentralizing. But nothing in the responses was about merit or the value of the initiative.
CAPTURE Part 4: THE MACHINE The fourth and final installment is out. Bitcoin Magazine wasn’t just covering the fight over Bitcoin’s future. Its parent operated an Ordinals trading desk, invested in businesses tied to the ecosystem, and maintained editorial policies that exempted parts of that same business. Then came an $80,000/month marketing contract, with an option for Nakamoto Inc. to buy BTC Inc at a valuation tied to its earnings, in a window that included the OP_RETURN fight. Nakamoto exercised the option. Readers were not consistently told about these commercial relationships. A documented investigation into the commercial interests and media infrastructure surrounding the Bitcoin Core controversy. citadel21.com/the-machine
1
8
2
41
3,747
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Must read, of course. Hodlonaut has done painstaking research into the inner working of Bitcoin Core, including many uncomfortable issues or governance. In my view, Hodlonaut has been the paramount of journalistic integrity, seeking comment from those he's covering. And, for matters of public record, he's shining a light on issues that bitcoiners might not be aware of. Read the series for yourself and come to your own conclusions. And, hopefully, some lessons can be learned and taken forward.
CAPTURE Part 4: THE MACHINE The fourth and final installment is out. Bitcoin Magazine wasn’t just covering the fight over Bitcoin’s future. Its parent operated an Ordinals trading desk, invested in businesses tied to the ecosystem, and maintained editorial policies that exempted parts of that same business. Then came an $80,000/month marketing contract, with an option for Nakamoto Inc. to buy BTC Inc at a valuation tied to its earnings, in a window that included the OP_RETURN fight. Nakamoto exercised the option. Readers were not consistently told about these commercial relationships. A documented investigation into the commercial interests and media infrastructure surrounding the Bitcoin Core controversy. citadel21.com/the-machine
4
20
156
3,337
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Replying to @Bitcoinapolis55
“Shocks in the economy”… like it’s magic…
1
1
38
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
"The Federal Reserve opened in 1914. A dollar from that year buys you about three cents of goods today..." Let that sink in 😳
A short history of currency debasement: Debasement is the oldest con in government. Rome ran it better than anyone until the twentieth century came along and said, "hold my beer." Under Augustus, the denarius started at 4.5 grams of nearly pure silver. By Nero's reign in 64 AD, the emperor had shaved it down to about 90 percent silver. Nero had fire damage to repair and games to fund. His successors kept clipping. By the time Gallienus ruled around 260 AD, the denarius and its descendant, the antoninianus, carried around 5 percent silver, a copper slug dipped in a thin silver wash that rubbed off in your palm. Prices in the empire rose more than a thousandfold across the third century. Diocletian then responded with the Edict on Maximum Prices in 301 AD, threatening death to any merchant who charged what the debased coins were actually worth. Merchants did the sensible thing and stopped selling. Shelves emptied. This method never changed, only the technology. Henry VIII of England ran the Great Debasement from 1544 to 1551, dropping the silver content of his coinage from 92.5 percent to 25 percent and pocketing the difference. Londoners noticed the king's copper nose showing through the silver on his own portrait and nicknamed him Old Coppernose. Clipping coins requires effort. Running a printing press requires almost none, which is why the modern state loves paper and loves screens even more. John Law gave France a preview in 1720 with his Banque Royale and a flood of paper livres backed by Mississippi fantasies. The scheme collapsed within a year. The French liked the lesson so little they repeated it with the assignats of the 1790s, printing until the notes were worth essentially nothing and executing speculators in between runs of the press. Then came central banking, which industrialized the whole operation and gave it a respectable name. The Federal Reserve opened in 1914. A dollar from that year buys you about three cents of goods today, a 97 percent loss of value, achieved without clipping a single coin. Nixon closed the gold window on August 15, 1971, and after that nothing anchored the dollar except the promises of the people printing it. The Fed expanded its balance sheet from roughly 870 billion dollars in 2007 to nearly 9 trillion by 2022. Your savings account paid less interest than the currency lost. Debasement transfers wealth from whoever holds the money to whoever prints it first. That is the entire mechanism, from Nero's mint to the Fed's open market desk. The man who spends the new money early buys at old prices. By the time the fresh units reach your wages, the prices already moved. You hold the bag. Gold held its weight for five thousand years because no committee could vote it into existence, and governments abandoned it for exactly this reason.
2
2
7
428
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Brutal
20
106
22
387
58,067
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Ukraine shredding Russian bot networks and saving Western democracy as a result would be an absolutely wild victory. Which is yet another reason why we need to keep funding and supporting Ukraine by giving them the weaponry they need to win.
According to Cloudflare Data Explorer the amount of russian bot traffic has dropped to 49% after Ukraine struck a yandex data center. Could this disrupt the midterm elections in the US?
47
815
37
5,352
357,339
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
The Ukrainian people are simply just trying to survive.
2,567
1,845
186
24,840
2,039,288
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
Trump has spent years blaming Zelenskyy for the results of Putin's actions, and now he's moved on to blaming him for his own.
What a disgrace to the United States and the free world. President Zelenskyy is on the side of liberty; the president of the world’s leading democracy is on the side of tyranny & aggression.
66
1,312
21
5,735
59,842
Bitcoinapolis: ₿= Money not S̷P̷A̷M̷ 🤓 retweeted
If Putin falls, both Russia and America will get a new president.
🚨On Zelenskyy, Trump says "he'd better damn well stop" hitting refineries in Russia because it's affecting diesel and hurting US farmers. "I think it's time for Ukraine to get a new president."
282
1,641
51
9,896
106,246