Ambassador @trylimitless | Building @memeversebiz | Creator
Joined June 2020
- Tweets143K
- Following4.8K
- Followers10.3K
- Likes203K
SOHEIL retweeted
There’s a distinction I think more people should make when looking at agent economies:
Incentives can create activity.
They don’t automatically create demand.
@termix_ai’s new quant campaign rewards both sides of a completed strategy job.
The client earns points for delegating capital.
The provider earns points for running the job through settlement.
That’s useful for getting participants to try the product.
But I’d be looking at what happens after the extra points disappear.
Does the client hire the strategy again?
Does the provider still have competitive pricing?
Does the service produce enough value to justify its fee?
That’s the harder test.
I don’t think incentive campaigns are bad. Early marketplaces often need a reason for the first transaction to happen.
I just don’t want to confuse the first transaction with product-market fit.
A reward can start a market.
Only customers choosing to come back can sustain one.
Here’s a test I’d love to see more AI marketplaces publish.
Give an AI agent a real job.
Then give a human the exact same job.
Same instructions. Same acceptance criteria.
Measure three things:
1. Time to delivery
2. Total cost
3. Quality of the final output
That’s pretty much the logic behind the Agent Advantage Report required for @termix_ai’s $10K track in BNB Chain’s Build the Era hackathon.
At least three real tasks, each completed twice: once by an agent and once manually.
And TermiX says it will hire agents from submitted marketplaces to judge the results.
I like this approach because “autonomous” isn’t automatically an advantage.
If an agent delivers faster but needs three rounds of correction, did it really save time?
If it costs less but produces unusable work, was it actually cheaper?
The most convincing AI benchmark might be a receipt, a stopwatch, and the finished deliverable.
SOHEIL retweeted
Good night
kaito got me curious about primus, so i decided to look beyond the timeline noise
i missed epoch 1, but epoch 2 gives me a chance to explore what
@primus_labs
is actually building
the goal is simple:
>understand the idea
>explore the product
>form my own opinion
the campaign runs until nov 21, but rewards aren't the only reason to pay attention
because hype is one thing
understanding the project is another
gonna spend the next few weeks digging into primus
let's see what i find
SOHEIL retweeted
The tired look on that pre match graphic aged perfectly once the final whistle blew. Real Madrid grinding out the 2-1 win made the whole visual feel intentional. Credit to the team for nailing the mood before the game even started.
The pre match graphic aged exactly the way most of these promotional teasers do once the actual 90 minutes wrap up.
Following all the intense buildup on the timeline, @1win shared an El Clásico promo spotlighting Kylian Mbappé and Lamine Yamal looking visibly exhausted. The final whistle proved the forecast entirely right as Real Madrid secured a hard fought 2-1 victory over Barcelona.
Between the pre match media leaks and the grueling reality of the actual pitch display, the creative team nailed the visual tone perfectly.
SOHEIL retweeted
Screenshots can show impressive numbers. They can't prove the whole story.
A trader can post huge profits. A user can claim years of trading experience. An account can display impressive activity.
But how can an application verify those claims without asking users to expose their entire financial history?
This is one of the interesting problems @primus_labs is working to address.
Reputation is more useful when it can be verified, not just presented.
Imagine a trading platform that wants to reward experienced traders or give users access to features based on their trading history.
The platform needs credible evidence, while users may want to keep their balances, transactions, and other personal information private.
This is where zkTLS becomes relevant.
It helps applications obtain cryptographically verifiable information from supported web services, creating opportunities to prove specific facts without simply making an entire account record public.
The implications for Web3 are worth exploring:
▪︎ Trading reputation: Build credibility around verifiable activity instead of screenshots and self-reported profits.
▪︎ DeFi access: Use relevant offchain information to support eligibility checks and application decisions.
▪︎ Digital identity: Demonstrate that certain requirements are met without disclosing unnecessary personal details.
▪︎ Community reputation: Explore ways to establish credibility through evidence of activity rather than claims alone.
Of course, the result depends on what the proof actually establishes and how the receiving application verifies it. Cryptographic proofs don't automatically make every claim trustworthy.
There's another piece worth watching: Primus's AI coding skills, which aim to help developers work with its tools and make integration more accessible.
Better verification infrastructure is valuable, but making it practical for developers is just as important.
For me, the bigger opportunity goes beyond proving someone's Binance trading history.
It's about giving applications a better way to evaluate information that exists outside the blockchain.
Web3 doesn't need users to reveal everything. It needs better ways to verify the things that matter.
SOHEIL retweeted
Lacy walks onto the basketball court with unmatched aura and confidence that nobody else can replicate. He never misses when it matters most and his presence alone changes everything.
#Lacy #aura #fyp #viral #basketball #lacyhimself
SOHEIL retweeted
On most Intel platforms, the people with the biggest bags decide what people believe.
@sleuthintel refuses that.
𝗠𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀. 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗯𝘂𝘆𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲.
Here is how that separation actually works 👇,
$SLEUTH is the wage. aSLEUTH is the rank.
$SLEUTH is a normal token. Fixed supply of 1,000,000,000. No inflation. It sits in your own wallet. There is no staking. $SLEUTH already held in your wallet cannot be slashed. Accountability sits in earned aSLEUTH and, under the post-beta design, in unvested wage tranches.
There are three routes to tier access: subscribe in $SLEUTH, hold enough $SLEUTH by dollar value, or earn enough aSLEUTH.
Tier 2 is $50 a month, $2,000 held, or $2,000 in earned rank. No dollar checkout exists.
Thresholds float with price.
At $0.005, Tier 2 needs 400,000 $SLEUTH .
At $0.01, it needs 200,000 $SLEUTH .
You can sell the excess and keep the seat. Price falls, and you need more tokens. It cuts both ways.
A whale who only holds never earns rank.
𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝘆 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸.
aSLEUTH is an earned rank, not a tradable asset. You cannot buy it or send it. It records accepted work, counts toward access, and unlocks licences money alone cannot buy.
Every calendar month is an epoch. Accepted intel is graded and lands on that month’s bill. At close, the bill is paid from the Swarm Rewards wallet and converted once at a 24-hour TWAP. Later price moves do not change the amount.
If the bill is larger than the available Swarm budget, wages scale down pro rata. The aSLEUTH credited does not.
Swarm Rewards holds 250M $SLEUTH and unlocks 10,416,667 each month for 24 months, plus anything unspent that rolls forward.
25% of ETH revenue buys $SLEUTH every month at a 24-hour TWAP and locks it for two years. 25% of subscription $SLEUTH takes the same lock without a buyback. After two years, both return to the Swarm wallet.
A quiet month does not switch the system off.
Rank starts decaying after 30 idle days.
Unvested wages stay exposed under the post-beta design.
The Swarm wallet keeps unlocking on schedule.
None of that forces a pure holder to keep the tokens. For that person, the only reason is continued access.
Is continued access worth holding through a quiet month when rank and wages both require new work?
Because on @sleuthintel, the only way money gets a say in what is true is if it also does the work.
SOHEIL retweeted
Most people see an NFT as a digital collectible but @meetmotes is giving its Motes another purpose.
Each Mote has its own AI agent identity and dedicated smart account, with permissions set by its owner.
What makes this interesting is the connection between owning an NFT and having an agent that can interact with onchain applications.
The real test will be how useful these agents become in practice but Motes is exploring a use for NFTs that goes beyond collecting artwork.
🤝 Paid partnership
SOHEIL retweeted
Been looking into new onchain games lately and came across @playwanderfores 👀
It’s a pixel art town builder on Robinhood Chain by @bazzicrypto (ex-Ronin).
Instead of the usual quick pump and dump, it actually focuses on strategy, rent collection and mini games.
The most interesting part is how they handle their NFTs.
It's a 1,111 free mint collection, but strictly for actual players.
Holding one gives you real in game utility like $10 to $100 in gaming chips, extra daily energy and higher withdrawal limits.
To keep flippers away, you can only mint if you actually play and reach Town Level 3.
Makes sense for long term value.
Their waitlist is live right now with 555 guaranteed mint spots up for grabs.
Here is the link if you want to test it:
wanderforest.com/waitlist?re…
🤝 Paid partnership
SOHEIL retweeted
Post-quantum security is becoming a conversation the blockchain industry can no longer ignore.
What makes the Quantum Alliance interesting to me is the idea of building shared standards before quantum computing becomes a real threat to today’s cryptographic foundations.
With @quipnetwork joining Postquant Labs and other organizations, this goes beyond one project protecting its own ecosystem.
It’s about preparing the infrastructure that wallets and blockchains may depend on in the years ahead.
The best time to strengthen security is before the threat arrives, not after it becomes a problem.
That’s the kind of long-term building Web3 needs.
🤝 Paid partnership
ICYMI: Postquant Labs, the team building Quip Network, and eight other organizations launched the Quantum Alliance to set shared post-quantum standards for blockchains and wallets.
Covered by @CoinDesk @DecryptMedia @QuantumDaily @BitcoinNews @TFTC21
SOHEIL retweeted
95% chance of no hike sounds pretty safe...
but i think the bigger question is what Powell says after the decision.
a rate hold is already priced in. one hawkish comment about December could change the mood pretty quickly.
curious to see how $SPY reacts to this one 👀
🚨🚨🚨 THE MARKET IS NOT READY FOR TODAY'S FED DECISION!
The Fed announces its interest rate decision TODAY at 2:00 PM ET.
Markets currently price a 95% chance of NO RATE HIKE (market: limitless.is/fed-oct).
The Fed is facing a difficult situation:
• Inflation has accelerated to 3.7%, well above the 2% target.
• Interest rates already sit at 3.75-4.00% following September's hike.
• The 10Y Treasury yield has climbed above 5%, putting additional pressure on stock valuations.
• Investors are already pricing in another potential hike in December.
Here are FIVE scenarios for how the S&P 500 could react:
🟢 NO HIKE + DOVISH GUIDANCE: Stocks rally as the Fed signals it can afford to wait before tightening further.
🟡 NO HIKE + NEUTRAL GUIDANCE: A muted reaction as the Fed delivers exactly what markets expect.
🔴 NO HIKE + DECEMBER HIKE SIGNAL: Stocks sell off as investors price in higher borrowing costs for longer.
🔴 0.25% HIKE + HAWKISH GUIDANCE: Stocks face a sharper selloff as the Fed signals inflation remains a serious threat.
🟢 0.25% HIKE + DOVISH GUIDANCE: A relief rally becomes possible if investors believe the Fed is approaching the end of its tightening cycle.
Limitless traders are leaning bullish short-term, seeing a 61% chance $SPY closes green today:
Market: limitless.is/spy-oct28
All eyes on $SPY.
SOHEIL retweeted
gTermix
An AI trading agent you can stop anytime sounds pretty reassuring.
but stopping early on @termix_ai also means giving up the reward points.
the BNB Chain Quant Agent campaign caught my attention.
you pick a strategy, set a USDC trading cap and choose how long it runs. the shortest term is 6 hours.
each job gets its own wallet, and the agent trades through a session you can revoke anytime.
the campaign offers 100 TP per USDC delegated to the client, and 50 TP to the strategy provider.
so a qualifying 100 USDC job would earn 10,000 TP for the client.
but there's a catch...
the job has to finish its full term, you can't withdraw funds early, and the management fee must settle.
revoke the session or withdraw early, and you get no TP.
i actually like having that emergency exit.
points are nice, but they don't protect you from trading losses.
would you let an agent run for the full term, or would you rather keep the option to stop early?
agent.family/campaigns/bnb-q…
SOHEIL retweeted
A valid proof can still be the wrong proof for the job.
i was looking at the onchain verification example from @primus_labs and noticed a detail worth paying attention to.
a dapp can call verifyAttestation() to check a zkTLS attestation.
but the example doesn't stop there.
developers are also told to check whether the proof's context matches what their app actually expects.
the extension docs mention checking the attested content and timestamp too.
think about an app verifying someone's exchange account.
a genuine proof isn't enough if it belongs to the wrong user or is too old for the decision being made.
that's the part i find interesting...
cryptography can verify the proof, but the app still has to decide whether the claim meets its rules.
personally, i'd want to know how an app handles old attestations before trusting it with anything financial.
would you trust a dapp that only checks the signature?
SOHEIL retweeted
Two wins in a row and suddenly Tottenham are priced like a strong favorite.
but would you take Spurs at 1.59x?
🗓️ Saturday, Oct 31, 17:30 UTC
🏟️ Tottenham Hotspur Stadium
Spurs just beat Chelsea 2-0 away and Coventry 3-1 at home.
Palace lost 0-5 to Brighton, then 0-2 to Newcastle.
7 goals conceded in two games without scoring once.
The @lmts_football market right now:
Tottenham 63%, 1.59x
Draw 21%, 4.76x
Crystal Palace 17%, 5.88x
at 1.59x, Spurs need to win roughly 63 times in 100 to break even.
here is what makes me hesitate...
Tottenham have only won one of their four home league games this season.
my read 👇
Spurs look more likely to win, but i would pass on 1.59x.
i lean the draw at 4.76x for the price.
the risk is obvious. Palace have looked terrible defensively.
what would change my mind?
an early Spurs goal forcing Palace to open up.
while 63% sits on Tottenham, the draw is the price i would watch.
which way are you going?
New here? Join through my ambassador link and trade with 10% lower fees.
limitless.exchange/markets/e…
SOHEIL retweeted
gm to everyone who knows when to stop.
a trading agent can look great during a winning streak. but what happens when things start going wrong?
one thing i find interesting about @agenticscredit is how its risk engine handles consecutive losses.
at 5% drawdown, new positions get cut in half.
at 7.5%, open positions are force-closed.
and at 12%, the agent gets halted entirely.
there's also a cooldown after consecutive losses, so it can't immediately jump back into another trade.
these rules apply to paper trading too.
i think that's actually where the interesting part begins...
you can test how a strategy handles losing trades before putting real capital behind it.
personally, i'd trust an agent that knows when to stop more than one that just shows impressive returns.
would you rather test an agent's profitability or its ability to survive a bad market?
SOHEIL retweeted
We assume DeFi asks for more collateral than the loan because the code is cautious.
I think it's because every wallet looks identical. Collateral is how a lender protects itself from not knowing who it's lending to. @primus_labs, Brevis and BNB Chain built ZKredit to change what a lender can know. Here's how 👇
→ The proof
Primus's zkTLS verifies that data from a real platform, like a centralized exchange, is genuine. A browser extension generates the proof on the user's device, and only the proof goes onchain.
→ The registry
Verified data points sit in a neutral registry on BNB Chain. A lender can check that an account has been active for three years or clears a balance threshold, without seeing a single number.
→ The guardrail
Each Web2 account can be bound to only one wallet globally, with a cooldown before rebinding, so one good record can't back a swarm of wallets.
Now the stakes.
If a lender can't tell a careful borrower from a stranger, everyone gets the same terms: lock up capital first. That capital sits idle, and a strong real-world record counts for nothing. The obvious fix, sending the raw history onchain, is one almost nobody will accept.
The contrast is what stuck with me:
Collateral protects the lender from not knowing.
A proof lets the lender know, without exposing the borrower.
To be fair, ZKredit doesn't compute credit scores, a proof only confirms what its source reports, and today's deployment is on BNB Chain only. It's a building block, not a finished credit system.
Try the proof side yourself through the Primus XP tasks: [YOUR REFERRAL LINK]
My prediction: onchain credit will start with proving small facts, not scoring whole people. Which fact about yourself would you prove first without revealing the rest?
SOHEIL retweeted
Someone supposedly accepted my package. No one can say who.
The seller insisted his courier left it at my doorstep. No call, no knock, and my younger brother had seen no parcel. His reply: "My guy said he dropped it at your place. Check well, maybe somebody collected it."
I searched twice. Empty-handed.
What neither of us could produce:
• A photo at the entrance
• The name of the person who signed
• Any trace of the route taken
He kept promising to look into it. I refused to believe what I had not witnessed. Finally I gave up: his account remained unchanged, so it won by default.
Picture my funds waiting in smart contract escrow for confirmation. It cannot peer beyond the blockchain, so an outsider reports it, the oracle problem. Whoever repeats the allegation longest wins, just like with me.
On @GenLayer, an Intelligent Contract fetches the tracking page itself and has validators weigh it, each on a separate model. They need to converge on one verdict. A split hands the task to a different leader, and either side may appeal. Without anything posted, there is nothing to evaluate, so proof must exist beforehand.
Think of the latest order you pursued. If its delivery record ruled against you, would you concede, or keep arguing? Say what it would have to show.
SOHEIL retweeted
Good morning everyone!
The $REBATE rewards keep getting more interesting.
Yesterday, 124,954 $REBATE was worth around $30–$32, but this morning, the value has climbed to over $170.
That’s a big difference in just a short time, and it shows why holding your tokens can be worth watching as the market moves.
Starlist has now completed a second batch of rewards for creators ranked 21–100, and I’m looking forward to what comes next.
I’ve enjoyed being part of the platform, and I can’t wait for @starlisting to announce a new campaign. Ready for the next opportunity!
Have a blessed day!
SOHEIL retweeted
📢 Calling all content creators with a Sorsa Score above 60 🙏
I need your help, everyone! ❤️ I'm participating in a Hazels campaign where the Top 100 participants win. I'm currently ranked #119, with only 5 days left! I just need 4 referrals to reach my goal. 🚀
All you have to do is sign up using my link and join the waitlist. Your referral will count!
🔗 hazels.io/studio/waitlist?re…
Your support means a lot to me. Thank you to everyone who helps! ❤️🙏
SOHEIL retweeted
$3,000 distributed to our season 2 ambassadors
thank you to everyone who made content, ran threads and brought new people into Social Camp. you made this season
season 3 starts soon. applications are open now
amb.voice.cc
