Ambassador @trylimitless | Building @memeversebiz | Creator
Joined June 2020
- Tweets143K
- Following4.8K
- Followers10.3K
- Likes203K
SOHEIL retweeted
There’s a distinction I think more people should make when looking at agent economies:
Incentives can create activity.
They don’t automatically create demand.
@termix_ai’s new quant campaign rewards both sides of a completed strategy job.
The client earns points for delegating capital.
The provider earns points for running the job through settlement.
That’s useful for getting participants to try the product.
But I’d be looking at what happens after the extra points disappear.
Does the client hire the strategy again?
Does the provider still have competitive pricing?
Does the service produce enough value to justify its fee?
That’s the harder test.
I don’t think incentive campaigns are bad. Early marketplaces often need a reason for the first transaction to happen.
I just don’t want to confuse the first transaction with product-market fit.
A reward can start a market.
Only customers choosing to come back can sustain one.
Here’s a test I’d love to see more AI marketplaces publish.
Give an AI agent a real job.
Then give a human the exact same job.
Same instructions. Same acceptance criteria.
Measure three things:
1. Time to delivery
2. Total cost
3. Quality of the final output
That’s pretty much the logic behind the Agent Advantage Report required for @termix_ai’s $10K track in BNB Chain’s Build the Era hackathon.
At least three real tasks, each completed twice: once by an agent and once manually.
And TermiX says it will hire agents from submitted marketplaces to judge the results.
I like this approach because “autonomous” isn’t automatically an advantage.
If an agent delivers faster but needs three rounds of correction, did it really save time?
If it costs less but produces unusable work, was it actually cheaper?
The most convincing AI benchmark might be a receipt, a stopwatch, and the finished deliverable.
SOHEIL retweeted
Good night
kaito got me curious about primus, so i decided to look beyond the timeline noise
i missed epoch 1, but epoch 2 gives me a chance to explore what
@primus_labs
is actually building
the goal is simple:
>understand the idea
>explore the product
>form my own opinion
the campaign runs until nov 21, but rewards aren't the only reason to pay attention
because hype is one thing
understanding the project is another
gonna spend the next few weeks digging into primus
let's see what i find
SOHEIL retweeted
The tired look on that pre match graphic aged perfectly once the final whistle blew. Real Madrid grinding out the 2-1 win made the whole visual feel intentional. Credit to the team for nailing the mood before the game even started.
The pre match graphic aged exactly the way most of these promotional teasers do once the actual 90 minutes wrap up.
Following all the intense buildup on the timeline, @1win shared an El Clásico promo spotlighting Kylian Mbappé and Lamine Yamal looking visibly exhausted. The final whistle proved the forecast entirely right as Real Madrid secured a hard fought 2-1 victory over Barcelona.
Between the pre match media leaks and the grueling reality of the actual pitch display, the creative team nailed the visual tone perfectly.
SOHEIL retweeted
Screenshots can show impressive numbers. They can't prove the whole story.
A trader can post huge profits. A user can claim years of trading experience. An account can display impressive activity.
But how can an application verify those claims without asking users to expose their entire financial history?
This is one of the interesting problems @primus_labs is working to address.
Reputation is more useful when it can be verified, not just presented.
Imagine a trading platform that wants to reward experienced traders or give users access to features based on their trading history.
The platform needs credible evidence, while users may want to keep their balances, transactions, and other personal information private.
This is where zkTLS becomes relevant.
It helps applications obtain cryptographically verifiable information from supported web services, creating opportunities to prove specific facts without simply making an entire account record public.
The implications for Web3 are worth exploring:
▪︎ Trading reputation: Build credibility around verifiable activity instead of screenshots and self-reported profits.
▪︎ DeFi access: Use relevant offchain information to support eligibility checks and application decisions.
▪︎ Digital identity: Demonstrate that certain requirements are met without disclosing unnecessary personal details.
▪︎ Community reputation: Explore ways to establish credibility through evidence of activity rather than claims alone.
Of course, the result depends on what the proof actually establishes and how the receiving application verifies it. Cryptographic proofs don't automatically make every claim trustworthy.
There's another piece worth watching: Primus's AI coding skills, which aim to help developers work with its tools and make integration more accessible.
Better verification infrastructure is valuable, but making it practical for developers is just as important.
For me, the bigger opportunity goes beyond proving someone's Binance trading history.
It's about giving applications a better way to evaluate information that exists outside the blockchain.
Web3 doesn't need users to reveal everything. It needs better ways to verify the things that matter.
SOHEIL retweeted
Lacy walks onto the basketball court with unmatched aura and confidence that nobody else can replicate. He never misses when it matters most and his presence alone changes everything.
#Lacy #aura #fyp #viral #basketball #lacyhimself
SOHEIL retweeted
On most Intel platforms, the people with the biggest bags decide what people believe.
@sleuthintel refuses that.
𝗠𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀. 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗯𝘂𝘆𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲.
Here is how that separation actually works 👇,
$SLEUTH is the wage. aSLEUTH is the rank.
$SLEUTH is a normal token. Fixed supply of 1,000,000,000. No inflation. It sits in your own wallet. There is no staking. $SLEUTH already held in your wallet cannot be slashed. Accountability sits in earned aSLEUTH and, under the post-beta design, in unvested wage tranches.
There are three routes to tier access: subscribe in $SLEUTH, hold enough $SLEUTH by dollar value, or earn enough aSLEUTH.
Tier 2 is $50 a month, $2,000 held, or $2,000 in earned rank. No dollar checkout exists.
Thresholds float with price.
At $0.005, Tier 2 needs 400,000 $SLEUTH .
At $0.01, it needs 200,000 $SLEUTH .
You can sell the excess and keep the seat. Price falls, and you need more tokens. It cuts both ways.
A whale who only holds never earns rank.
𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝘆 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸.
aSLEUTH is an earned rank, not a tradable asset. You cannot buy it or send it. It records accepted work, counts toward access, and unlocks licences money alone cannot buy.
Every calendar month is an epoch. Accepted intel is graded and lands on that month’s bill. At close, the bill is paid from the Swarm Rewards wallet and converted once at a 24-hour TWAP. Later price moves do not change the amount.
If the bill is larger than the available Swarm budget, wages scale down pro rata. The aSLEUTH credited does not.
Swarm Rewards holds 250M $SLEUTH and unlocks 10,416,667 each month for 24 months, plus anything unspent that rolls forward.
25% of ETH revenue buys $SLEUTH every month at a 24-hour TWAP and locks it for two years. 25% of subscription $SLEUTH takes the same lock without a buyback. After two years, both return to the Swarm wallet.
A quiet month does not switch the system off.
Rank starts decaying after 30 idle days.
Unvested wages stay exposed under the post-beta design.
The Swarm wallet keeps unlocking on schedule.
None of that forces a pure holder to keep the tokens. For that person, the only reason is continued access.
Is continued access worth holding through a quiet month when rank and wages both require new work?
Because on @sleuthintel, the only way money gets a say in what is true is if it also does the work.
SOHEIL retweeted
Most people see an NFT as a digital collectible but @meetmotes is giving its Motes another purpose.
Each Mote has its own AI agent identity and dedicated smart account, with permissions set by its owner.
What makes this interesting is the connection between owning an NFT and having an agent that can interact with onchain applications.
The real test will be how useful these agents become in practice but Motes is exploring a use for NFTs that goes beyond collecting artwork.
🤝 Paid partnership
SOHEIL retweeted
Been looking into new onchain games lately and came across @playwanderfores 👀
It’s a pixel art town builder on Robinhood Chain by @bazzicrypto (ex-Ronin).
Instead of the usual quick pump and dump, it actually focuses on strategy, rent collection and mini games.
The most interesting part is how they handle their NFTs.
It's a 1,111 free mint collection, but strictly for actual players.
Holding one gives you real in game utility like $10 to $100 in gaming chips, extra daily energy and higher withdrawal limits.
To keep flippers away, you can only mint if you actually play and reach Town Level 3.
Makes sense for long term value.
Their waitlist is live right now with 555 guaranteed mint spots up for grabs.
Here is the link if you want to test it:
wanderforest.com/waitlist?re…
🤝 Paid partnership
SOHEIL retweeted
Post-quantum security is becoming a conversation the blockchain industry can no longer ignore.
What makes the Quantum Alliance interesting to me is the idea of building shared standards before quantum computing becomes a real threat to today’s cryptographic foundations.
With @quipnetwork joining Postquant Labs and other organizations, this goes beyond one project protecting its own ecosystem.
It’s about preparing the infrastructure that wallets and blockchains may depend on in the years ahead.
The best time to strengthen security is before the threat arrives, not after it becomes a problem.
That’s the kind of long-term building Web3 needs.
🤝 Paid partnership
ICYMI: Postquant Labs, the team building Quip Network, and eight other organizations launched the Quantum Alliance to set shared post-quantum standards for blockchains and wallets.
Covered by @CoinDesk @DecryptMedia @QuantumDaily @BitcoinNews @TFTC21