Pinned Tweet
3 strikes and you're out.
If you're looking for an "argument" I have rules.
psybertron.org/rules-of-rhet…
If after 3 exchanges I consider you to be arguing in bad faith - strawmen, whataboutery, ignoring actual content, etc - I routinely block. Life's too short😎
Ian Glendinning retweeted
I was invited to panel w/Zizek a few y ago. So I read 2 of his books & couldn't figure out what it was abt, so I declined. I now bitterly regret missing the occasion as I attended one of his lectures and althought I still understood nothing I found him playfull & mesmerizing.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
He's gone full Russell Brand, never go full Russell Brand.
@TRobinsonNewEra
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Michael Levin (@drmichaellevin) says today's LLMs are "trapped in the same attractors of thinking that have held several fields back for decades." His point is about ideas. Here's a physics reading of the word, which is mine, not his.
How long a pattern lasts and what it costs to hold are two different numbers. A frozen model's weights are a pit carved once by training. Nothing in the model's own dynamics pays to keep them; the storage does that. That is why the weights can't move on their own. A brain is closer to the opposite. Much of what it holds is paid for continuously, which is part of why it can drift, update, forget.
So the escapes run backward. To move the weights you pay a barrier: new data, retraining. To move much of a brain's state you stop paying: cut the upkeep and a lot of it fades. Not all of it; some memory sits in structure.
One word, attractor, two different physics. The divider is not how deep the well is. It is whether something keeps circulating underneath to hold it open. That is my framing of the old equilibrium vs non-equilibrium split (Prigogine; Seifert 2012), not a new law.
Test it on anything said to last "for free": measure whether something circulates underneath. Zero circulation, it is a frozen pit. Nonzero, it is paying to last.
🤖 Made with AI
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Mitch McConnell has just delivered a warning Trump cannot afford to ignore.
In The Wall Street Journal, the veteran Republican senator warned that Trump’s continued submission to Putin could jeopardise his entire legislative agenda.
McConnell calls Trump’s Russia policy strategically naive and morally bankrupt. More importantly, he signals that Republican senators may withhold their support unless Trump changes course.
This is no longer merely about Ukraine. It is about whether Republicans will allow an American president to keep rewarding a Russian dictator while undermining America’s allies.
For once, Trump may discover that Congress has a spine.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
1/ Last month I told a room of Baltic intelligence officers and diplomats that Donald Trump is an asset of Russian intelligence. Not one of them blinked. "Of course," they said. Ho hum. But in America, saying it out loud is still taboo. Why? 🧵
Ian Glendinning retweeted
"I don’t give a damn. We’re making a freaking fortune."
There is no slogan more fitting for this White House.
Pulling no punches.
El-Sayed: In my Neurology unit, I would have to give that MOCA exam, that cognitive test he's so proud of… The only people you give that test to are people who you worry may have cognitive deficits. By definition, if you’re taking one of those tests, something is wrong.
And you know the doctor who gave it to him was like, I just want to see how smart you are, sir. And he's like, me too.
He brags about having taken it. He's like I remembered the rhinoceros. You're like Habibi, everybody remember the rhinoceros.
And the funny thing about it is, you know, he's taken it multiple times. So he's not even bragging about the first time he took it. He's like, I took it the 1st time and then I took it the 2nd time. So with Donald Trump, you can't blame him for this, he's just dumb.
But for Mike Rogers, can you imagine how small of a human being you have to be to know that he has real deficits and to just nod your head approvingly at the most ridiculous shit that the man proposes?
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Time To Interrogate @elonmusk.
And the rest of Trump’s corporate kleptocracy
Link in bio and comments.
🤖 Made with AI
Ian Glendinning retweeted
I went to see the new Sense and Sensibility movie yesterday.
In general, I was disappointed.
They changed the story in a few key ways, the overall mood was gloomy, and the styling was awful.
Much worse, though, Mr. Palmer was played by a “non-binary” woman.
When the character came on the screen, my husband and I looked at each other in confusion.
The styling was male, but the character had a weak voice, short stature, and effeminate appearance.
I googled it mid-movie, and apparently the actress is Eliot Sumner, the daughter of singer Sting.
As is always the case with this kind of casting, it was distracting and confusing and weakened the plot.
Presumably because of the odd casting/choice, they gave Mr. Palmer a smaller role than usual.
All the humor of his character was deleted.
Fans of the 1995 version with Emma Thompson and Kate Winslet might remember that the character was played by Hugh Laurie (famous as Dr. House).
Laurie was perfect – droll and hilarious.
Wokeism ruins everything it touches.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
“It’s all lies.” “Nothing’s happening.” “Show us video!”
Well, here it is. 👇
Boats seized. Engines seized. Smuggling supply chains disrupted.
A glimpse of this Government’s work tackling the gangs. Watch it. Then tell me nothing’s happening.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Elon Musk has spent more money on American elections in the last two years than George Soros has in his entire life.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
It should be illegal for the President, VP, and lawmakers in Congress to own, buy, and sell individual stocks.
FIRST ON CBS: President Trump’s oil and gas stocks have gained millions during the Iran war, a Democratic report finds. cbsn.ws/4e0uwWs
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Everyone involved in this war, dare I say it, from both sides of the trenches, should read @terfdiarist - it’s an invaluable documentation of, as it turns out, only a fraction of the lunacy. But crystal clear examples of how insane it all became.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Nobel Prize winner Prof. Robinson describes #Somaliland as a compelling example of successful indigenous state-building. After receiving his Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his studies on how institutions are formed and how they affect prosperity, Professor James A. Robinson highlighted Somaliland's peace process and consensus-building during his Nobel lecture on December 8, 2024, at Stockholm University's Aula Magna. Prof. Robinson is the co-author of the acclaimed book Why Nations Fail, which explores how inclusive political and economic institutions drive long-term prosperity.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
‘This was a masterclass in performance and stage presence from @OfficialHuey and when it comes to commanding a stage, the King of New York is still in a league of his own!’
Full live report out now! ⬇️
houseofcoco.net/huey-morgan-…
#hueymorgan #music #livemusic #southampton
Ian Glendinning retweeted
'Male teachers have worked in girls’ schools for some time, it’s not a new concept.'
Yep ... I went to a girls' school. There were lots of male teachers - including the odd one we found a bit creepy.
But here's four things they never did:
1. Tell us they were women and that we had to call them 'Miss'
2. Publish an article in the newspaper about travelling abroad for a 'sex change' op and/or hold a raffle to raise money for it (1990s pre-internet version)
3. Use toilets, showers and changing facilities reserved for female staff or students - or claim they were entitled to do so
4. Supervise girls getting changed for PE or dance - or claim they were entitled to do so
Had they done any of these things - or had there been even the slightest concern they *might* be - this would have raised serious safeguarding concerns.
Now girls - and their parents - are told its 'unkind' to question what would once have been extremely concerning behaviour.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Classic Norm: reward the patience, kill the punchline, leave Conan and the audience wrecked.
Ian Glendinning retweeted
Ralph Fiennes has been a very, very naughty boy! He had the absolute audacity to publicly defend J.K. Rowling, the author of a series that gave him one of his most iconic roles to date… that of Harry Potter’s nemesis, Voldemort. Everyone is expected to perfectly goose-step in line and denounce her for her original sin of ‘transphobia’ due to a series of Tweets.
Fiennes is not the sort of man to get dragged along in pointless slacktivism on the internet. He doesn’t Tweet about how woke he is, he doesn’t run around with little rainbows on his lapels… no, Ralph Fiennes is an actual professional. No nonsense, old-school — you’re here to act, so act! I like that. He’s an admirable chap
Meanwhile Radliffe, Watson and whatever-his-name-is who plays Ron, the ginger sidekick, have all spat out Rowling and publicly denounced her, because the Gods of Social Justice have put a fatwa on her name.
Voldie: “I find the level of hatred that people express about views that differ from theirs, and the violence of language towards others, disturbing.”
Beautiful! To the point. And oh-so true. It is disturbing how incredibly, extremely, over-the-top pissed people get at you when you go against the narrative and dare to criticise whatever’s the current hype. The very fact that Fiennes is now “under fire” for a comment so benign, in defense of a woman so marvelous, is… terrifying.
Half the millennial cast of the Harry Potter universe wishes to all-but cancel the very Creator of their own universe, the woman to whom each of them owe their lucrative careers. Not Fiennes. Fiennes was somebody before Voldemort, and continued to be somebody after. He doesn’t need to defend or attack anyone. But he does, anyway, because he’s a decent human being.






























