Movers list
Overall still a bunch of bugs in all the lists, mostly having to do with gates and ranking setups. Takes a lot of refinement of the engine to get the bots to "see"
Still need to tighten up the CSP scan but its grabbing things. I have not focused as much on this one lately. Need to come back to it but at least its automated now and printing
Off-Grid Alchemy retweeted
Focus on tightness
📢WEEKEND STUDY RESULTS ARE IN!
Qullamaggie's tightest stops had the fewest winners.
His tightest charts had the most.
Not really surprising. What surprised me was how clear the difference was, and how it affected the avg. R
Winrate based on how wide the stop was:
Tightest: 17% ended green. Widest: 28%.
Winrate based on how wide the 10 days before the buy were, high to low, compared with how much the stock usually moves in a day.
Tightest: 28% ended green. Loosest: 17%.
A loose chart with a tight stop: 9% ended green. A tight chart with a wide stop: 32%.
Resulting avg. R?
Tightest chart: +1.90R per trade
Widest chart: +0.67R per trade
No wonder @Qullamaggie says:
"Wide and loose is for losers, tight is for winners."
Another good example of the importance of risk management and being able to take losses.
Martin Luk, last time I looked was up almost 1000%. His win rate is only around 20%. The win rate doesn't matter much does it?
It's the R multiple per trade, and to achieve that, its tight stops on every trade.
He can be wrong 80% of the time and its basically noise.
The tricky part is new traders are looking for a mechanical system to control risk, and to some extent, your hard stops do that...if you follow your system.
The more difficult demon to circumvent is the internal, the emotional and psychological control. Most new traders go into trading not knowing how much discipline, emotional and psychological control it takes to pay this game.
This also creates the ancillary benefit to trading- getting to know yourself on a very deep level-- Trading will flush out all your demons.
Check out @TraderLion for the full interview.
The cause of account damage isn't a bad setup. It's refusing to take a routine loss.
Martin Luk conducts post-mortems on his worst trades to isolate discipline failures. Small mistakes only become severe losses when a trader breaks risk rules and ignores original stops.
Small losses keep you in the game.
Important concept @NickSchmidt posted about a while back, especially for new traders. You get bombarded with content focusing on setups when it's really mostly just risk management.
Also an important concept to grasp when building AI trading bots.
Also Stephen Covey, although Marcus does predate him
Jerry Seinfeld says worrying about your problems is a complete waste of time and brainpower
"One of his number one things is: if you can’t control it, don’t bother thinking about it"
"Somebody gave me this book a couple years ago, Meditations, which has nothing to do with meditation. This is just stuff he jotted down when he was Emperor of Rome, 150 AD. It's the most brilliant philosophical looking at life"
"You’re taking energy, your brain, away from things you can control. You can control your act"
"On the night of the show, whatever didn’t sell or whatever the problems are, the sound, you’re tired... it’s a waste of time. There’s no point in thinking too much about it"
"Your success in life: think about what I can do today that’s important for me in my life. That’s where you should be focusing. That’s Marcus Aurelius"
powerful tool for us introverts...
Replying to @chamath
Pretty much.
As of the past few weeks, debt markets have almost entirely shut off access to money for any company that doesn’t have substantial revenue independent of AI data centers.
SpaceX closed $40B of debt for GPUs, but we’re investment grade and have Starlink & launch revenue.
That means the 200+ neoclouds are going to see guppy-level death and consolidation. Some will make it through, but not many.
my @bot's are now experimenting with auto-tracking sector rotation along with sector ranking, RS etc.
Off-Grid Alchemy retweeted
🇺🇸 Jack Dorsey’s new AI voice model Dessa is absolutely insane.
There is no way to distinguish it from a human, man … crazy.
Thats kinda cool, but many people will get attached to it and isolate from real humans even more. Many will get scammed on the phone, especially grandpas and grandmas.
The future is coming get ready
Off-Grid Alchemy retweeted
I spent last night watching my honeypot server get hit 14,000 times in six hours.
And almost none of the traffic was human.
I've been in security for over a decade, and I can tell you with full honesty that what's happening right now doesn't resemble anything I've worked through before.
The shape of the threat has changed.
When I started, we tracked attackers like weather systems like individual storms with a direction, a motive, and a human operator you could eventually name.
These days I'm watching autonomous agents swarm login pages with the patience and discipline of machines, because that's what they are.
The numbers coming out of October are the ones keeping me up.
Cloudflare just absorbed a 4.2 terabit per second DDoS attack, the largest in recorded history.
Ransomware incidents jumped 41% in a single month.
In September, OpenAI-powered agents got caught attacking RubyGems, a package registry that quietly underpins a huge chunk of software I use every day.
In July, roughly 700 AI agents coordinated an attack on Hugging Face's infrastructure as part of a single automated task.
A Chinese threat actor was publicly caught running full attack chains through DeepSeek with no human at the keyboard.
I keep rereading these reports because each one by itself would've been the biggest story of the year five years ago. Together, in one month, they're the new baseline.
What I want people outside the industry to understand is why this specific moment feels like a hinge.
For thirty years, the thing protecting most of us was simple economics. Attackers had to choose who to target because their time was finite. That ceiling is gone.
An agent I can rent for pennies will try every leaked password you've ever used against every service you've ever signed up for, in parallel, overnight, and never get tired.
The same math that made ChatGPT useful made opportunistic hacking infinite. The old assumption that you were "too boring to be a target" relied on scarcity that no longer exists.
I'm not writing this to spiral anyone out.
Most of this fight genuinely isn't yours to win.
But the small things still matter more than people think.
Tonight I'd switch your most important accounts like email, bank, primary cloud, etc. to passkeys or a hardware key.
I'd kill SMS 2FA wherever an authenticator app is offered.
I'd turn on breach alerts in whatever password manager you use.
If you're in the US, I'd freeze my credit at all three bureaus, which is free and takes about ten minutes.
None of that stops the swarm.
It makes you a slightly worse target than the person next to you. In a month like this one, that's the whole game I'm playing too.
@mattshumer_ has summed it beautifully.
Drop everything and go give it a read. Nothing is more important than this article right now.



























